Telenor: good news from India; troubles continue in Russia/CIS

Telenor HQ: India, Pakistan and Russia issues on the agenda

A recent DevelopingTelecomsWatch article went into the likelihood of mobile market consolidation in Pakistan. I was prompted to write this by a rumour doing the rounds, according to which Telenor is considering selling its operation in Pakistan to China Mobile, which already has a presence in the market in the form of the MNO Zong. I noted that Telenor's presence in Pakistan was worrying the authorities in neighbouring India - worrying them to the extent that it could make it impossible for the Scandinavian telco to increase its stake in start-up Indian cellco Unitech Wireless. Such is the level of tension between the two countries, it seems.

I moved on to speculate (wildly, I admit) that Telenor's thinking might be along the following lines:

• We can't play in India and Pakistan...
• India (population 1.15 billion, mobile penetration 34.47%) presents massively richer opportunities than Pakistan (population 173 million, mobile penetration 55.58%)...
• so, if being in Pakistan prevents us from maximising the opportunity in India, let's get out of Pakistan...
  

Last week, however, came news of a possible way for Telenor to maintain a presence in both markets. An Economic Times article of 30th July indicates that India's Home Ministry is set to give security clearance for Telenor's hiking its stake in Unitech Wireless up to 74%, but on the condition that none of the staff who have worked at the Norwegian firm's Pakistan operation, are employed in India.

The Indian authorities are not only concerned about Telenor's Pakistan connections, it seems. Security agencies apparently also had reservations regarding the Norwegian company's presence in Bangladesh, where Telenor is the largest shareholder in market-leading cellco Grameenphone. The Economic Times article notes that both the neighbouring countries not only have a history of strained ties with India, "but have also served as a launchpad for various terror attacks". In the case of Bangladesh, investigations into serial terrorist blasts that killed 80 and injured 216 in the northern Indian tourist city of Jaipur last year pointed to the involvement of Bangladesh-based terrorist group Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami, according to local reports.

The Economic Times piece notes that Indian authorities have had to take into account the concerns of the security agencies while also keeping in mind the reputation and stature of the Norwegian firm and how it has revolutionised rural telephony in Bangladesh via Grameenphone. The Bangladeshi MNO takes its brand name from that of Telenor's local partner Grameen Telecom, a non-profit sister concern of the internationally acclaimed microfinance organisation and community development bank Grameen Bank. A Grameenphone-Grameen Telecom partnership operates the national Village Phone programme, which puts mobile phones in the hands of very poor women who then operate a business, offering access to communications services to their neighbours.

This programme is not purely altruistic and has been an important component of an encouraging growth and profitability story for Grameenphone - and in a market where other cellcos have struggled to succeed. In this blog's most recent previous article, we heard from the CEO of rival Banglalink, which is owned by Egypt's Orascom Telecom. Ahmed Abou Doma explained in a recent statement that apart from the market leader (Grameenphone), "others are continually posting losses".

The Economic Times article also states that the Indian Government is keen not to send out the wrong message to foreign investors and has therefore "come around to the view that the Norwegian giant should not be held back from picking up up to [a] 74% stake in Unitech Wireless simply because it has a successful presence in Pakistan. " Keeping the human assets of the Indian and Pakistani arms of Telenor separate is expected to take care of risks such as spying and subversion, the article suggests.

For Telenor, good news from India comes at the same time as much less encouraging news from Russia. Within the last few hours, Reuters has reported that the Norwegian group has lost another round of its legal battle over its stake in Russian cellco Vimpelcom. The latest development in a long-running and acrimonious saga sees a Moscow appeals court rejecting Telenor's latest attempt to delay the enforcement of a USD 1.7 billion fine owed to Vimpelcom. Telenor faces the prospect of losing its stake in the Russian company after bailiffs ordered the sale of its shares to cover the fine that a Siberian court imposed for allegedly holding back Vimpelcom's expansion in Ukraine. Maria Kiselyova of Reuters writes that the case is being closely watched as a guide to the climate for foreign investors in Russia, coming after the shareholder battle last year that forced management and personnel changes at BP's Russian oil joint venture, TNK-BP. Kiselyova asserts that analysts watching the case, brought by Farimex, a small shareholder in Vimpelcom, say the forced sale of Telenor's stake in Russia's second-biggest mobile phone company by subscriptions "would further undermine confidence in the rule of law in Russia." She continues by saying that Telenor views the case as part of a protracted dispute with the powerful conglomerate of Russian billionaire Mikhail Fridman, Alfa Group, the other strategic investor in Vimpelcom. Alfa, as Kiselyova notes, has denied any links to Farimex.

These developments follow a Q2 performance which beat the expectations of analysts polled by Reuters. The Norwegian telco posted a bigger-than-expected 6.8% rise in Q2 core earnings and curbed investments to protect against a potential fall in mobile revenues amid global economic hardship. EBITDA rose to USD 1.24 billion.

Telenor also cut its CAPEX target, excluding investments in India, to 13-15% of its revenues from an earlier prediction of 15-17%. An impairment charge for its Serbian operation, linked to a poorer outlook for that country, hit its bottom line, driving earnings per share down from last year's figures.

It remains to be seen, though, how a bigger stake in India's Unitech Wireless and possibility of losing its foothold in Russia and the wide CIS (where Vimpelcom has numerous subsidiaries) will affect Telenor going forward.

Telenor: good news from India; troubles continue in Russia/CIS

Pakistan: 5 (really 6 [or 7?]) becomes 4 (or 5 or 6?)?

China Mobile: keen to drive consolidation of Pakistan's mobile market?

With a population of around 173 million and a mobile penetration rate of just 55.01% (according to WCIS), Pakistan would appear to be an attractive place to be for multinational telecoms groups. Some very significant individuals, however, have recently expressed the belief that market conditions are too tough to support the current number of mobile operators competing in the country. A specific suggestion about a possible merger between operators has also surfaced in the last few days.

According to Pakistani news portal Dawn.com, Telenor is considering selling its operation in Pakistan to China Mobile, which already has a presence in the market in the form of the MNO Zong. The Dawn.com article contends that the Norway-headquartered international telcoms group has been deliberating a withdrawal from Pakistan for some time because of "security issues".

Shortly after this report surfaced, Reuters was carrying a 'no comment'/denial from Telenor. The Reuters snippet notes that ARPU at Telenor Pakistan was the lowest of all its operations around Europe and Asia but that the number of subscribers grew by nearly 20% year-on-year. Why, then, would the Norwegian group consider this move?

Let me put forward a possibly outlandish theory, which also relates to security concerns - but security concerns in India rather than in neighbouring Pakistan.

A few days ago, the Economic Times ran an article about how the Indian Government has withdrawn approval for ByCell, a company "promoted by Russian businessmen", to offer telecoms services in the country. The company had planned to set up as a GSM mobile operator in areas including Assam, Bihar, Orissa and West Bengal, but seems to have endured a long struggle to get the green light to do so. As far as I can make out from this and other articles, the Indian Foreign Investment Permission Board (FIPB) has been concerned by the security implications of ByCell's ownership structure and its sources of funding for some time.

The same Economic Times piece also indicates that the FIPB is uncomfortable with the idea of Telenor increasing its stake (currently 49%) in cellco Unitech Wireless. Again, "security concerns" are the cause of the problem - in this case to do with the fact that Telenor operates in Pakistan, with which India has long had an uneasy relationship.

This, then, is my possibly highly simplistic and implausible theory: Telenor sees India as a far richer prize than Pakistan and therefore considers selling its Pakistani operation to China Mobile in order to pave the way for establishing a full controlling stake in Unitech Wireless. Crazy? Maybe. Or maybe I'm onto something. This is just a wild stab in the dark, so who knows?

Either way, China Mobile certainly seems keen to accelerate the growth of its share of Pakistan's mobile subs (currently estimated at 7.20% by WCIS) by acquiring a rival player and consolidating the market. Well, certainly if the Dawn.com article is to be believed. This contends that "before the merger talks with the Telenor group... China Mobile had offered to buy the management shares of Warid Telecom Pakistan" but could not settle on an acceptable price.

The article also claims that Pakistan's five leading mobile operators - Mobilink, Telenor Pakistan, Ufone, Warid Telecom and China Mobile's Zong - have reportedly all told the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) that there is room for only four players. The further claim is made that a PTA official has said that by 2010 the country may indeed have just four mobile operators.

I have no idea of the source of this assertion, but it does now seem clear that Telenor Pakistan, at least, feels that the market is currently split too many ways. According to Mehtab Haider of the Pakistani newspaper the News, writing today, the cellco's CEO Jon Eddy Abdullah predicts market consolidation. In an interview with the News, Abdullah said Pakistan had the lowest call rates in the world and a continuous reduction in charges, as seen in the past, to attract customers was no longer viable. "This means that in the long term, having five operators in a market with intense competition and low prices may not remain feasible anymore," said Abdullah. "This can result in anything from mergers and acquisitions to [players] dropping out of the market," he added.

Abdullah mentioned two other significant challenges faced by operators in Pakistan - double-digit inflation affecting consumers' ability to afford services and the "overall law and order situation" limiting network expansion, restricting maintenance activity, increasing security-related expenses and dampening investor confidence.

The security situation in the country certainly does seem to present challenges for cellcos. Orascom Telecom-owned Mobilink, for example, has suffered damage to its network due the military opetation in Swat and Buner, where the army has been fighting with militant insurgents.

The Telenor Pakistan CEO was a little more upbeat about recent tax measures made by the country's Government - lower General Sales Tax; SIM activation tax slashed by 50%; the elimination of regulatory duty on handsets; lower customs duty on imported handsets.

"Although we consider these tax measures positive," said Abdullah, "we feel that there is more to be done. We are all aware of the impact of high tax rates on the industry, which depress growth in subscriber numbers, divert investments and ultimately discourage mobile usage."

"We also understand that when this industry flourishes," he continued, "it helps the economy by attracting foreign direct investment, contributing heavily to the national exchequer, generating employment and increasing productivity of almost every sector. Therefore, it is imperative that the taxation structure for the mobile industry is rationalised further."

Another telecoms industry leader seeminly keen to see cellular sector consolidation is Walid Irshaid, President and CEO of PTCL, Pakistan's incumbent wireline operator, in which the UAE's Etisalat owns a minority stake (but with management control), and of which MNO Ufone is a wholly owned subsidiary.

Farhan Sharif of Bloomberg, writing late last month, states that PTCL is in talks with several domestic companies to make acquisitions this year. "We’re already in discussions with various carriers and operators," Walid Irshaid said in an interview with Bloomberg News on June 16th during the CommunicAsia 2009 conference in Singapore. "The market must surely consolidate", continued Irsaid because he feels that Pakistan doesn’t need more than three GSM operators. He declined to name the companies with which he is in talks.

Between the Zong-Telenor takeover rumour and the comments of the CEOs quoted here, there does seem to be a body of evidence to suggest Pakistan's mobile market is set for consolidation.

So, how many cellcos would that leave? Thus far, this article has mentioned five currently in operation. There is, however, at least one more doing business in the country (which is why this article has a title that looks like a confusing equation).

One of these is rather unusual - the Special Communication Organisation (SCO), set up by the Government of Pakistan to provide services in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and Northern Areas. According to one article I found, Pakistani army officers, both serving and retired, hold critical positions in the SCO.

One other cellco confuses me. Instaphone, a US TDMA network operator, was once part-owned by Millicom International Cellular (as was Paktel - sold to China Mobile and rebranded Zong). A slew of articles going back at least as far as January 2008 suggest the MNO had its licence terminated some time ago by the PTA for failing to make outstanding payments. However, the operator's website remains live and it still seemed to be fighting the PTA as recently as April this year. According to WCIS, the US TDMA operator currently has around 50,000 subs on its network - a market share of just 0.05%.

Pakistan: 5 (really 6 [or 7?]) becomes 4 (or 5 or 6?)?

South Asia: cellcos contend with tough trading conditions but continue to record subscriber growth

According to a short note published by Telecompaper this week, the mobile market in Pakistan returned to growth mode in January, with overall subscription numbers rising to 90.703 million vs. the 89.907 recorded in December. I am not sure where these numbers come from. The WCIS databsase maintained by Informa Telecoms & Media logged a slightly different figure for December, 90.162 million, so it seems reasonable to think that estimates for January may vary as well.

WCIS did record a fall in subscriptions from November to December, although the exact numbers did not match those mentioned in a brief Global Mobile Daily report of 20th January, which noted that Pakistan's total mobile subscription base declined 0.6% at end-December to 89.9 million from 90.4 million in November, according to the telecoms regulator the PTA.

I looked around for an explanation for the contraction in market size late last year. The neatest seems to be the one outlined briefly at the Pro Pakistani telecom & IT news blog earlier this week. The reason given there for that fall in numbers is the loss of subscribers who had failed to register and verify their SIMs. SIM verification is currently quite a contentious issue, the MNOs apparently contending that a new system could compromise privileged information and "hurt the credibility of the cellphone industry."

Mobile operators in Pakistan may not sell active ready-to-go SIMs. Instead, new users purchase an inactive SIM and must then register their details. What is newer is the requirement for operators to furnish the National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) with their subscribers' mobile phone numbers before the activation of SIMs. The operators reportedly had no objection to providing other data about their customers, e.g. parents' names, address, place of birth etc. This newer requirement, however, has not gone down well with the MNOs, whose leaders are reported to have said that the new clause clashes with their contracts with the PTA, which had allowed them to keep their clients' information secret.

When the Dawn newspaper contacted senior executives of Mobilink, Telenor, Warid Telecom, Zong and Ufone, the responses were strongly worded. "Why does NADRA need our customers' numbers? It's ridiculous. This information is privileged and is only to be provided to the government...if there is a (credible) national security concern as mentioned in the terms and conditions of our licences," said a Mobilink executive. "How will this information be used? It is equally detrimental for companies and subscribers," said another top executive, adding that the new clause might jeopardise the entire mobile industry.

"This was not part of the agreement when we paid Rs291 million licence fees," said a Zong executive. "Licence terms cannot be changed just like that. We are providing [a] public service. We hired more than 300 people, trained them, set up new call centres and brought in expensive new equipment just to make the SIM verification system a success," he said.

From Telenor Pakistan, Dawn's reporter learned that both the PTA and NADRA came down hard on the cellcos, leaving them with no choice but to sign the new agreement. "We were told that this agreement was not negotiable. Without signing it, we will not be allowed to sell SIMs. It's a question of compromising an industry that generates Rs2 billion annually," said a source within the Norwegian-owned MNO

"Unjustifiably, NADRA had earlier raised the verification fee by almost 200 per cent," said a representative for Warid Telecom.

After all this fuss in January, the operators appear to have been working quite hard to win back lost custom. Reduced rates have been a quick remedy.

Naeem Pani Wala, a Pro Pakistani contributor, wrote last month about the resulting 'Paisa war', taking note of Zong's especially aggressive undercutting of market-leading Mobilink. "Despite the fact that current economic situation doesn’t allow low pricing," writes Naeem, "we know that this doesn’t matter much for [the] Chinese and they beat the competition with low rates."

Naeem analyses the various TV advertisements run by Pakistan's MNOs. His view seems to be that, being unable to compete with Zong purely on price, Mobilink has decided to focus on coverage and quality of service, as in this ad:



Naeem feels this is a good approach, enabling Mobilink to remain highly visible to consumers "without investing much on packages." According to Naaem's article, Telenor Pakistan seems to be staying out of the hottest price war action and focussing its efforts on dominating the high value post paid space, as explified by this advertisement:

Over time, I assume we will see figures indicating that while Pakistan's cellcos have managed to get back onto the subscriber growth path, the price war reported by Naeem is affecting earnings.

A South Asian market where there already seems to be confirmation of this is Sri Lanka. Cellular News reported earlier this week that market-leading Dialog Telekom has suffered a sharp drop in prepaid ARPU, which fell by 22.6% from Q4 2007 to Q4 2008. "Sri Lankan consumers may have been unpeturbed by local or global economic circumstances in 2008", says the Cellular News artcle, "but Dialog was not. Despite the strong customer growth, annual revenues grew by just 1.0% to SLR 33,108m. A 48.4% rise in costs saw gross profit down 26.0% to SLR 15,478m, while EBITDA fell 41.6% to SLR 8,370m. Fourth-quarter EBITDA was even worse hit, a massive 75.6% decline taking the figure to SLR 740m from SLR 3,027m in Q4 07. This was partly due to exceptional items, but even on a normalised basis there was a fall of 51.6% to SLR 1,466m."

While subscriber growth looks good in principle, it does seem that South Asian markets are at the stage where operators have realised that extending the availability of services to ever less affluent population segments will mean higher costs and steadily declinding ARPU. Let's see how many of the region's operator suffer significant hits to EBITDA as a result.

South Asia: cellcos contend with tough trading conditions but continue to record subscriber growth

Bharti Airtel to go international in 2009? Could competitive pressures at home make it a must-do strategy?

Earlier this month, I was wondering where MENA region-headquartered groups such as Orascom Telecom, Etisalat, Zain etc. might next go shopping for extensions to their empires. I discussed the view that the current economic climate has created a nice opportunity for Gulf-based telcos. That view was echoed this week by my former Informa Telecoms & Media colleague Nick Jotischky, whom I last saw in Dubai last December at GSM>3G Middle East, the final Com World Series event in which I was involved before leaving the company.

My guess for a while has been that any telcos struggling in the current climate may be prepared to sell off assets at rather lower prices that they would consider in happier times, hence the opportunity for MENA region players. Moreoever, writing this week, Nick notes that traditonally strong and expansionist mobile players such as Orange/France Telecom and Telenor are now more reluctant to get involved in further acquisitions activity, which may make the prices of potential targets lower still for Gulf region telcos looking to expand further. In Nick's article, he wonders whether powerhouse cellcos from China and India might also have the appetite for global expansion. "Some say the global mobile telecoms industry could go the way of the steel sector, which is largely dominated by emerging market players," writes Nick.

Nick notes that Bharti Airtel and China Mobile are the leaders of the two fastest-growing mobile markets in terms of subscriptions, with India adding just over 100 million subscriptions in 2008 and China 89 million. Nick feels this means that these two giant cellcos are therefore focusing on their domestic markets, noting that China Mobile is also busy rolling out its TD-SCDMA network. Bharti Airtel, Nick asserts, "has intense - even brutal - competition to contend with while preparing to launch its 3G network."

One element of the tough competitive environment in India is the fact that state-owned operators BSNL and MTNL have beaten Bharti Airtel and other private sector MNOs to the punch in terms of going to market with 3G services. According to a telecoms.com article, BSNL has rolled out 3G services in an additional eleven cities following the launch of its first 3G service in Chennai earlier this month. MTNL, meanwhile, has launched 3G services in central New Delhi with the stated aim of attracting 200,000 to the service within two years.

The article notes that "if BSNL and MTNL were to have a substantial head start over 3G rivals, particularly if the spectrum auctions, as many industry commentators now believe, are unlikely to take place until the end of this year, the licences would surely look less attractive to investors weighing up India's 3G opportunity." If this has the effect of driving down the amount of money the Indian Government is able to raise through the long-delayed auctions, the article continues, this too could work to the advantage of BSNL and MTNL because the price they both have to pay for their 3G spectrum has to match the highest winning auction bids in each of the respective circles.

As the telecoms.com article also notes, BSNL also has a first-mover advantage when it comes to BWA spectrum because while the BWA auctions are scheduled to take place the same time as the 3G licence awards, "BSNL is already sitting on a chunk of pan-Indian 20MHz spectrum in the 2.5GHz band." Again, the article continues, BSNL does not have to pay for its BWA spectrum until the BWA auctions take place.

In the mobile space, Bharti Airtel, with 26.38% of subscriptions according to the World Cellular Information Service, leads a select group of larger Indian cellcos. Other major players include Vodafone Essar (18.77% market share), Reliance Communications (16.63%) and Idea Cellular (11.71%). Of the two state-owned 3G early movers, BSNL is another significant player, occupying fourth place in the market with 12.74% of subscriptions. MTNL, which is also active in wireline telephony and CDMA WLL, is a much smaller GSM mobile player, with only 1.20% of subscriptions.

Of the few further existing opertators with single-digit market share, one in particular has been in the news quite a lot of late. CDMA network operator Tata Teleservices (7.01% market share) has announced that it will be seting up 100 new cell sites in the state of Gujarat by August, according to a Business Standard story today. This seems to be the latest component of a drive to extend the geographical reach of the Tata network. In October, Global Mobile Daily reported the company's plans to expand its services into the Jammu and Kashmir operating circle by the end of November, thereby becoming the fourth operator in that market alongside BSNL, Bharti Airtel and Aircel. The war chest for this expansion will be boosted by the USD 822.67 million which Tata Teleservices raised by selling a 49% stake in its tower unit to Quippo Telecom Infrastructure, a deal which was announced in January.

The CDMA operator has certainly been deemed attractive by NTT DoCoMo of Japan, an existing shareholder which has had a move to add a further 20.25% stake in the business approved by India's cabinet, according to a Global Mobile Daily story of 24th February. This stake was up for grabs because its previous owner, the broadband player Tata Communications was strapped for cash and had pressured the Indian Government to allow the sale of a share in the CDMA mobile operator, according to an earlier Global Mobile Daily article, which reported that Tata Communications has been "particularly hard hit by the credit crunch and that the operator has told the Department of Telecommunications that it will be nearly impossible for it to carry out its business plans unless it receives new funding."

Government approval was needed because the state holds a 26.12% stake in Tata Communications, formerly known as VSNL, and was therefore able to veto the sale of the company's stake in Tata Teleservices, in which DoCoMo already owned a 26% share. According to yet another GMD story in January, Tata Communications is also planning a USD 51 million bond issue to help finance its bid for WiMAX spectrum.

Tata Teleservices is aiming to grow further by addressing the relatively untapped rural market, having done a deal with Impetus Infotech India to launch services for value-added services aimed at farmers and related communities, providing updated information on current prices of commodities across the country. According to the Business Standard article, Tata Teleservices expects around 60-70% of new additions to its subscriber base to come from rural areas.

Tata Teleservices may also ratchet up the competitive pressure in India's mobile market by enabling Virgin Mobile India, in which the CDMA MNO owns a 50% stake, to enter the GSM space. Prior to reading an Economic Times article earlier this week, I had not realised that Tata would be following Reliance Communications in migrating from CDMA to GSM family technology. This mobile standards migration seems to me quite reminiscent of what has happened in Brazil, where the operator Vivo, which had been the lone CDMA player, chose to make the move to GSM in order to compete more effectively with its rivals.

At present, Virgin Mobile is positioned as India’s first youth-centric mobile service, according to this week's Economic Times piece, and its services are offered on the Tata Teleservices CDMA network via a brand franchisee arrangement.

"Our agreement with TTSL is technology neutral. At present, our services are restricted to CDMA. Once TTSL unveils its GSM network, we will extend the Virgin services into GSM as well," says Virgin Mobile India CEO M.A. Madhusudan. The article states that Virgin Mobile is now gearing up to launch its GSM service as soon as Tata Teleservices does. "Nearly 73% of the Indian mobile market is controlled by GSM operators. An entry into GSM will help us to expand our addressable market and also increase our average revenue per user. Currently, our ARPU is nearly 30% higher than the industry average," said Mr Madhusudan. The article continues: "In a bid to expand its portfolio, Virgin is also keen to enter the business phone segment", qouting Mr Madhusudan: "We are in talks with multiple handset vendors, including Research in Motion... there are also plans to launch data cards."

CDMA operators migrating to GSM. Virgin Mobile beefing up its MVNO play. State-owned operators stealing a march in the 3G space and in the WiMAX services arena. I imagine this is what Nick Jotischky meant by 'brutal' domestic competion for Bharti Airtel. I can therefore understand speculation about India's mobile market leader looking beyond the borders of its home country for growth opportunities. As Nick noted this week, the Indian cellco has shown its hand before, having failed in a previous bid to acquire South Africa's MTN. Nick feels that "as an operator with proven experience of coping with the lowest tariffs in the world while sustaining growth, Bharti would have an innovative approach to the challenges presented by African markets" and argues that "at the root of this innovation in India is Bharti's use of outsourcing, in not only its network and IT functions but also its call-center and customer-relationship services." Nick feels that this kind approach would be an alternative to the one taken thus far by African operators and says that "it will be worth watching how new entrant Econet Wireless Kenya fares, having pledged to use outsourcing as a key strategy."

Nick feels that China Mobile, meanwhile, may be encouraged by recent success in Pakistan and go on to expand elsewhere in Asia. China Mobile's Pakistan outpost, CM Pak (branded Zong), has, in Nick's view, built its success on cheap tariffs and an aggressive network rollout plan. Nick notes that "a sign of that success is the fact that in 3Q08, CM Pak added more subscriptions than any of its rivals."

Nick conludes his article by predicting that "we can expect China Mobile to stretch its Asian coverage and Bharti [Airtel] to return to Africa," but feels it would probably be premature for either company to reach out any farther. I have thought about the China Mobile case a lot less, but having considered the many competitive pressures endured by Bharti Airtel at home, my guess is that the Indian cellco must be thinking very seriously about where it might extend its footprint.

Bharti Airtel to go international in 2009? Could competitive pressures at home make it a must-do strategy?