Knocked back in Sri Lanka, India's state sector telcos continue to eye international expansion opportunities

BSNL: global ambitions?

DevelopingTelecomsWatch has followed, with some interest, suggestions that India's two major state sector telecoms operators - BSNL and MTNL - might be aiming to become international players.

In September, this blog went on a meandering tour of emerging markets M&A rumours, during which it was mentioned that BSNL's bid for Millicom International Cellular's Sri Lankan MNO had been unsuccessful. Tigo Sri Lanka, as reported more recently here, was eventually acquired by Etisalat of the UAE, in a move which prompted some analysts to express fear for the profitability of the island nation's other mobile operators. These commentators have noted that Etisalat tends to compete fiercely on price when coming late to a cellular market.

In the same September M&A tour, DTW also quoted industry watchers who were warning both BSNL and MTNL to steer clear of reported attempts to acquire a stake in Kuwaiti-owned pan-MEA mobile group Zain. A Mint article by Shauvik Ghosh was referenced, in which an anonymous analyst said that BSNL would be advised not to purchase a stake in Zain. "BSNL has a lot of cash on its books but it lacks the ability to execute," said the mystery man. Not shy of the odd split infinitive, the unknown analyst said "Africa is not a market for an operator to just add some revenue to its balance sheet. They have to first show that they can execute in India with the opportunities already in front of them like broadband and 3G before they can venture into bigger game like Zain." A previous DTW article discussed at some length the view that the two public sector telcos have perhaps not yet demonstrated that ability to "execute in India" to anything like a satisfactory degree.

There is evidence, though, from as recently as mid-October, that BSNL and MTNL have not been deterred by such criticism and that the two companies continues to investigate both the Zain opportunity and other potential foreign adventures.

Writing on 15th October, Mansi Taneja of the Business Standard reports that a consortium led by Delhi-based Vavasi Group is in discussions with both BSNL MTNL for a majority stake in a special purpose vehicle that is being formed for a bid for Zain.

Taneja quotes "a top source close to the consortium" who has said: "Our talks with BSNL and MTNL are on track, but we don’t have any exclusivity contract with them. We are also holding informal discussions with other telecom companies, including China Mobile, in case talks with BSNL and MTNL do not fructify."

(note to self: attempt to use the word 'fructify' in conversation this week)

Is it unfair on the two Indian operators to venture the suggestion that the giant Chinese cellco might be a far more powerful player to have involved in an audacious bid to acquire operations and subscribers across Africa and the Middle East? Way back in 2002, the Chinese operator stole Vodafone's crown as the world's leading mobile operator in terms of subscriber numbers. Vodafone was subsequently seen to stake out its credentials as the world's largest cellco by revenues. Finally, in September this year, this accolade was also swiped by China Mobile.

If the Vavasi Group does turn out to be more impressed by the credential of the world's most gigantically-huge-mobile-operator-by-every-measurement-ever than by what BSNL and MTNL can bring to a bid for Zain, where else might the two Indian operators look for overseas growth opportunities?

One possibility, again aired by the indispensable Business Standard, is a much more modest foray into Africa, namely the acquisition of a majority stake in Zamtel, the state-owned incumbent telco of Zambia, which competes in the mobile space and is the monopoly fixed-line operator. On 15th September, the Government of the landlocked southern African country announced its intention to part-privatise the telco through the sale of up to 75% of the company’s equity. Industry watchers Buddecomm, in their Zambia profile, describe the country's wireline infrastructure as "at a very low level of development, which in turn has impeded growth in the Internet sector." Zamtel's monopoly in this space is set to be threatened, continues the Buddecomm profile, which notes that "the country’s ISPs are rolling out wireless broadband networks, which will also position them as competitors in the telecoms sector once VoIP is fully liberalised", something which is meant to be "a key component in Zambia's new ICT Policy."

The Zambia Development Agency (ZDA) makes a more upbeat assessment of the Zamtel fixed network, claiming that it connects all major population centres and is undergoing a substantial upgrade, with over 80% of switching infrastructure now digital, and DSL capacity being rolled out. The ZDA claims that Zamtel’s primary fixed-wireless network is also being upgraded and expanded, with coverage and capacity expected to more than double within the next twelve months. Zamtel’s secondary fixed-wireless network, based on WIMAX technology, is designed to cover the whole of metropolitan Lusaka, and is scheduled to go live during 2010, says the ZDA.

In the mobile space, Zamtel lags a long way behind its competitors in terms of market share. The stats, estimated for September 2009 by WCIS look like this:

1. Zain Zambia - 72.17%
2. MTN Zambia - 23.12%
3. Zamtel - 4.71%

Zamtel, then, is struggling to compete effectively against two of Africa's leading mobile groups. There is, however, room for all competitors to grow, with Zambia's mobile penetration rate currently standing at just under 33% according to WCIS. Whether BSNL and MTNL are ideally suited to improving the fortunes of the company, however, could be questioned in light of some of the criticisms aired here about their performance in their home market of India. According to the Business Standard, the two public sector telcos are joined by seven other companies or consortia from in having successfully prequalified to participate in a bid for Zamtel.

Should both the relatively modest aspiration of buying control of Zambia's incumbent operator and the rather more grand designs on Zain both come to nought, MTNL and BSNL do appear to have ambitions to establish a presence in other regions.

Again, I am indebted to India's Business Standard for an update. According to an article of October 23rd, the two operators, along with the Vavasi Group, are planning to set up new operations in Russian and western Europe.

Under this deal, the article states, Vavasi "is acquiring frequency spectrum and licences for Russia and several western European countries" and "the same [special purpose vehicle] that is being formed to acquire a majority stake in Zain will be used to invest in the Russian operations."

Confirming the development, a senior Vavasi executive is quoted as having said: "We are in the process of acquiring a licence for the new generation (NG)-1 technology and have applied in Russia and four other European countries."

This is where I betray the fact that I am not an engineer by wondering about this "NG-1 technology". What is it? The Business Standard article claims that "NG-1 technology is an alternative to GSM and CDMA and was developed in the US universities" and that "Vavasi claims that the network needs lower capital expenditure as well as operating expenses."

I'll hold my hands up. This is a new one on me.

An inspection of the Vavasi website reveals that NG-1 is a proprietary wireless access technology the company has developed itself and which it claims "understands the need of both rural and urban areas". Impressive sounding claims are also made for the spectrum efficiency and eco-friendly credentials of the technology.

NG-1 sounds wonderful - but can proprietary kit from India really prevail against global standards such as WiMAX, HSPA and LTE?

Some grand claims, then, are being made about the ambitions of India's two major state sector telecoms companies. Some of these claims seem to be articulated rather more loudly by the Vavasi Group than by the telcos themselves. I wonder how much there is in all of this. Can two operators that have attracted much criticism in their home market really be set to emerge as global players?

Knocked back in Sri Lanka, India's state sector telcos continue to eye international expansion opportunities

Telenor: good news from India; troubles continue in Russia/CIS

Telenor HQ: India, Pakistan and Russia issues on the agenda

A recent DevelopingTelecomsWatch article went into the likelihood of mobile market consolidation in Pakistan. I was prompted to write this by a rumour doing the rounds, according to which Telenor is considering selling its operation in Pakistan to China Mobile, which already has a presence in the market in the form of the MNO Zong. I noted that Telenor's presence in Pakistan was worrying the authorities in neighbouring India - worrying them to the extent that it could make it impossible for the Scandinavian telco to increase its stake in start-up Indian cellco Unitech Wireless. Such is the level of tension between the two countries, it seems.

I moved on to speculate (wildly, I admit) that Telenor's thinking might be along the following lines:

• We can't play in India and Pakistan...
• India (population 1.15 billion, mobile penetration 34.47%) presents massively richer opportunities than Pakistan (population 173 million, mobile penetration 55.58%)...
• so, if being in Pakistan prevents us from maximising the opportunity in India, let's get out of Pakistan...
  

Last week, however, came news of a possible way for Telenor to maintain a presence in both markets. An Economic Times article of 30th July indicates that India's Home Ministry is set to give security clearance for Telenor's hiking its stake in Unitech Wireless up to 74%, but on the condition that none of the staff who have worked at the Norwegian firm's Pakistan operation, are employed in India.

The Indian authorities are not only concerned about Telenor's Pakistan connections, it seems. Security agencies apparently also had reservations regarding the Norwegian company's presence in Bangladesh, where Telenor is the largest shareholder in market-leading cellco Grameenphone. The Economic Times article notes that both the neighbouring countries not only have a history of strained ties with India, "but have also served as a launchpad for various terror attacks". In the case of Bangladesh, investigations into serial terrorist blasts that killed 80 and injured 216 in the northern Indian tourist city of Jaipur last year pointed to the involvement of Bangladesh-based terrorist group Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami, according to local reports.

The Economic Times piece notes that Indian authorities have had to take into account the concerns of the security agencies while also keeping in mind the reputation and stature of the Norwegian firm and how it has revolutionised rural telephony in Bangladesh via Grameenphone. The Bangladeshi MNO takes its brand name from that of Telenor's local partner Grameen Telecom, a non-profit sister concern of the internationally acclaimed microfinance organisation and community development bank Grameen Bank. A Grameenphone-Grameen Telecom partnership operates the national Village Phone programme, which puts mobile phones in the hands of very poor women who then operate a business, offering access to communications services to their neighbours.

This programme is not purely altruistic and has been an important component of an encouraging growth and profitability story for Grameenphone - and in a market where other cellcos have struggled to succeed. In this blog's most recent previous article, we heard from the CEO of rival Banglalink, which is owned by Egypt's Orascom Telecom. Ahmed Abou Doma explained in a recent statement that apart from the market leader (Grameenphone), "others are continually posting losses".

The Economic Times article also states that the Indian Government is keen not to send out the wrong message to foreign investors and has therefore "come around to the view that the Norwegian giant should not be held back from picking up up to [a] 74% stake in Unitech Wireless simply because it has a successful presence in Pakistan. " Keeping the human assets of the Indian and Pakistani arms of Telenor separate is expected to take care of risks such as spying and subversion, the article suggests.

For Telenor, good news from India comes at the same time as much less encouraging news from Russia. Within the last few hours, Reuters has reported that the Norwegian group has lost another round of its legal battle over its stake in Russian cellco Vimpelcom. The latest development in a long-running and acrimonious saga sees a Moscow appeals court rejecting Telenor's latest attempt to delay the enforcement of a USD 1.7 billion fine owed to Vimpelcom. Telenor faces the prospect of losing its stake in the Russian company after bailiffs ordered the sale of its shares to cover the fine that a Siberian court imposed for allegedly holding back Vimpelcom's expansion in Ukraine. Maria Kiselyova of Reuters writes that the case is being closely watched as a guide to the climate for foreign investors in Russia, coming after the shareholder battle last year that forced management and personnel changes at BP's Russian oil joint venture, TNK-BP. Kiselyova asserts that analysts watching the case, brought by Farimex, a small shareholder in Vimpelcom, say the forced sale of Telenor's stake in Russia's second-biggest mobile phone company by subscriptions "would further undermine confidence in the rule of law in Russia." She continues by saying that Telenor views the case as part of a protracted dispute with the powerful conglomerate of Russian billionaire Mikhail Fridman, Alfa Group, the other strategic investor in Vimpelcom. Alfa, as Kiselyova notes, has denied any links to Farimex.

These developments follow a Q2 performance which beat the expectations of analysts polled by Reuters. The Norwegian telco posted a bigger-than-expected 6.8% rise in Q2 core earnings and curbed investments to protect against a potential fall in mobile revenues amid global economic hardship. EBITDA rose to USD 1.24 billion.

Telenor also cut its CAPEX target, excluding investments in India, to 13-15% of its revenues from an earlier prediction of 15-17%. An impairment charge for its Serbian operation, linked to a poorer outlook for that country, hit its bottom line, driving earnings per share down from last year's figures.

It remains to be seen, though, how a bigger stake in India's Unitech Wireless and possibility of losing its foothold in Russia and the wide CIS (where Vimpelcom has numerous subsidiaries) will affect Telenor going forward.

Telenor: good news from India; troubles continue in Russia/CIS

Pakistan: 5 (really 6 [or 7?]) becomes 4 (or 5 or 6?)?

China Mobile: keen to drive consolidation of Pakistan's mobile market?

With a population of around 173 million and a mobile penetration rate of just 55.01% (according to WCIS), Pakistan would appear to be an attractive place to be for multinational telecoms groups. Some very significant individuals, however, have recently expressed the belief that market conditions are too tough to support the current number of mobile operators competing in the country. A specific suggestion about a possible merger between operators has also surfaced in the last few days.

According to Pakistani news portal Dawn.com, Telenor is considering selling its operation in Pakistan to China Mobile, which already has a presence in the market in the form of the MNO Zong. The Dawn.com article contends that the Norway-headquartered international telcoms group has been deliberating a withdrawal from Pakistan for some time because of "security issues".

Shortly after this report surfaced, Reuters was carrying a 'no comment'/denial from Telenor. The Reuters snippet notes that ARPU at Telenor Pakistan was the lowest of all its operations around Europe and Asia but that the number of subscribers grew by nearly 20% year-on-year. Why, then, would the Norwegian group consider this move?

Let me put forward a possibly outlandish theory, which also relates to security concerns - but security concerns in India rather than in neighbouring Pakistan.

A few days ago, the Economic Times ran an article about how the Indian Government has withdrawn approval for ByCell, a company "promoted by Russian businessmen", to offer telecoms services in the country. The company had planned to set up as a GSM mobile operator in areas including Assam, Bihar, Orissa and West Bengal, but seems to have endured a long struggle to get the green light to do so. As far as I can make out from this and other articles, the Indian Foreign Investment Permission Board (FIPB) has been concerned by the security implications of ByCell's ownership structure and its sources of funding for some time.

The same Economic Times piece also indicates that the FIPB is uncomfortable with the idea of Telenor increasing its stake (currently 49%) in cellco Unitech Wireless. Again, "security concerns" are the cause of the problem - in this case to do with the fact that Telenor operates in Pakistan, with which India has long had an uneasy relationship.

This, then, is my possibly highly simplistic and implausible theory: Telenor sees India as a far richer prize than Pakistan and therefore considers selling its Pakistani operation to China Mobile in order to pave the way for establishing a full controlling stake in Unitech Wireless. Crazy? Maybe. Or maybe I'm onto something. This is just a wild stab in the dark, so who knows?

Either way, China Mobile certainly seems keen to accelerate the growth of its share of Pakistan's mobile subs (currently estimated at 7.20% by WCIS) by acquiring a rival player and consolidating the market. Well, certainly if the Dawn.com article is to be believed. This contends that "before the merger talks with the Telenor group... China Mobile had offered to buy the management shares of Warid Telecom Pakistan" but could not settle on an acceptable price.

The article also claims that Pakistan's five leading mobile operators - Mobilink, Telenor Pakistan, Ufone, Warid Telecom and China Mobile's Zong - have reportedly all told the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) that there is room for only four players. The further claim is made that a PTA official has said that by 2010 the country may indeed have just four mobile operators.

I have no idea of the source of this assertion, but it does now seem clear that Telenor Pakistan, at least, feels that the market is currently split too many ways. According to Mehtab Haider of the Pakistani newspaper the News, writing today, the cellco's CEO Jon Eddy Abdullah predicts market consolidation. In an interview with the News, Abdullah said Pakistan had the lowest call rates in the world and a continuous reduction in charges, as seen in the past, to attract customers was no longer viable. "This means that in the long term, having five operators in a market with intense competition and low prices may not remain feasible anymore," said Abdullah. "This can result in anything from mergers and acquisitions to [players] dropping out of the market," he added.

Abdullah mentioned two other significant challenges faced by operators in Pakistan - double-digit inflation affecting consumers' ability to afford services and the "overall law and order situation" limiting network expansion, restricting maintenance activity, increasing security-related expenses and dampening investor confidence.

The security situation in the country certainly does seem to present challenges for cellcos. Orascom Telecom-owned Mobilink, for example, has suffered damage to its network due the military opetation in Swat and Buner, where the army has been fighting with militant insurgents.

The Telenor Pakistan CEO was a little more upbeat about recent tax measures made by the country's Government - lower General Sales Tax; SIM activation tax slashed by 50%; the elimination of regulatory duty on handsets; lower customs duty on imported handsets.

"Although we consider these tax measures positive," said Abdullah, "we feel that there is more to be done. We are all aware of the impact of high tax rates on the industry, which depress growth in subscriber numbers, divert investments and ultimately discourage mobile usage."

"We also understand that when this industry flourishes," he continued, "it helps the economy by attracting foreign direct investment, contributing heavily to the national exchequer, generating employment and increasing productivity of almost every sector. Therefore, it is imperative that the taxation structure for the mobile industry is rationalised further."

Another telecoms industry leader seeminly keen to see cellular sector consolidation is Walid Irshaid, President and CEO of PTCL, Pakistan's incumbent wireline operator, in which the UAE's Etisalat owns a minority stake (but with management control), and of which MNO Ufone is a wholly owned subsidiary.

Farhan Sharif of Bloomberg, writing late last month, states that PTCL is in talks with several domestic companies to make acquisitions this year. "We’re already in discussions with various carriers and operators," Walid Irshaid said in an interview with Bloomberg News on June 16th during the CommunicAsia 2009 conference in Singapore. "The market must surely consolidate", continued Irsaid because he feels that Pakistan doesn’t need more than three GSM operators. He declined to name the companies with which he is in talks.

Between the Zong-Telenor takeover rumour and the comments of the CEOs quoted here, there does seem to be a body of evidence to suggest Pakistan's mobile market is set for consolidation.

So, how many cellcos would that leave? Thus far, this article has mentioned five currently in operation. There is, however, at least one more doing business in the country (which is why this article has a title that looks like a confusing equation).

One of these is rather unusual - the Special Communication Organisation (SCO), set up by the Government of Pakistan to provide services in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and Northern Areas. According to one article I found, Pakistani army officers, both serving and retired, hold critical positions in the SCO.

One other cellco confuses me. Instaphone, a US TDMA network operator, was once part-owned by Millicom International Cellular (as was Paktel - sold to China Mobile and rebranded Zong). A slew of articles going back at least as far as January 2008 suggest the MNO had its licence terminated some time ago by the PTA for failing to make outstanding payments. However, the operator's website remains live and it still seemed to be fighting the PTA as recently as April this year. According to WCIS, the US TDMA operator currently has around 50,000 subs on its network - a market share of just 0.05%.

Pakistan: 5 (really 6 [or 7?]) becomes 4 (or 5 or 6?)?

Zain Africa Speculation Watch: Episode 9 - Can Vivendi do it?

Zain CEO Saad al Barrak:
thumbs up to the sale of Zain's African operations? You'd have to ask the shareholders...

DevelopingTelecomsWatch celebrates its 100th blog post with another episode of Zain Africa Speculation Watch. Will that turn out to have been a future-proof title for this mini-series? Maybe not, because for the first time since DTW started visiting this theme, one of the companies rumoured to be interested in acquiring the African assets of the Kuwaiti telecoms group has actually confirmed that interest. It seems, therefore, that we are now moving beyond the speculation stage.

That said, perhaps for now we can stick with the term 'speculation' in the title of these musings. The speculation today, however, will move from wondering which prospective suitor looks the most plausible to wondering whether one particular suitor really has the wherewithal to do the deal.

That suitor is one whose name seems to have been in the mix since day one - Vivendi, the French international media conglomerate which is active in music, TV, movies, publishing, video games and telecoms.

Last Thursday, the group confirmed that there is indeed some interest in acquiring Zain's African operations. James Middleton of telecoms.com, reporting the story the next day, concluded his article with the caveat that the French firm has cautioned that at this stage there is no certainty that the discussions will lead to an acquisition.

This last point is echoed by a Financial Times article written the same day, which notes that Vivendi Chairman & CEO Jean-Bermard Lévy has "a track record of walking away from deals he regards as too expensive", something that has provided "some reassurance to analysts that the company will not over-pay."

The last time we looked at this story here, sums of USD 10 billion and USD 12 billion were mentioned as possible prices for Zain's collection of African MNOs. This is not far off the money from a Vivendi perspective according to the FT article, which cites "people familiar with the matter" who apparently say that the French group values Zain's African unit at USD 10-11 billion. A big concern for Vivendi, however, according to the company's statement of July 9th, is "keeping its credit rating and its dividend at their current levels".

This last point was mentioned in Episode 3 of Zain Africa Speculation Watch, when I noted that Reuters writer Adam Durchslag had expressed doubts about how Vivendi, with net debt of around EUR 8.3 billion, would be able to afford such a significant acquisition without putting that all-important investment grade BBB credit rating in jeopardy.

This concern about maintaining the group's credit rating notwithstanding, were this purchase to go ahead, it would, as the FT article notes, be Mr Lévy's fifth large acquisition in less than four years. The same article reports the opinion that the purchase of Zain Africa makes good strategic sense, giving Vivendi wider exposure to fast-growing markets at a time when its domestic telecoms and pay-TV businesses are facing stronger competition and its music business is in decline.

While it is pretty clear that Vivendi has pretty compelling reasons to consider a purchase of this size and nature, it is worth asking once again why Zain might be prepared to make the sale. According to the FT, Zain CEO Dr Saad al Barrak simply felt obliged to alert the Kuwaiti group's shareholders to the approach by Vivendi.

"If we are approached by big players with clear value creation we have to pass this to our shareholders. This is not a decision for us on the management level. It is all up to the shareholders to decide," the Zain CEO told the FT. He also revealed that only Vivendi has made an offer for the African assets.

Those shareholders have already felt the effects of the speculation. Matt Smith of Reuters reported yesterday that Zain's shares jumped 9.8% after news broke of Vivendi's confirmed offer for the company's African unit. Sounds good? Sure, but the very day that Vivendi was confirming its offer, Saad al Barrak had denied a deal was on, causing a fall of almost 9% in Zain shares, according to another Reuters article.

It remains to be seen whether that means that no other groups are likely to come forward to trump any offer from the French group - if such an offer does ever happen. Doubts are likely to remain for now. As Cyril Altmeyer of Reuters wrote late last week, analysts have expressed the view that it would be possible for Vivendi to take full control of Zain's African operations without endangering its BBB rating. Altmeyer's article quotes an unnamed banker who contends that with Vivendi having put something on the table, Zain and its advisers are probably figuring out whether to have targeted discussions with other interested parties." The same banker feels that potentially interested parties would be France Telecom, China Mobile and Vodafone.

This article also states that one way for Vivendi to make the Zain Africa acquisition without risky capital raising at group level would be to make the approach though Maroc Telecom, which is not in debt and in which the French group holds a 53% stake.

More twists and turns, then. Keep watching.

Zain Africa Speculation Watch: Episode 9 - Can Vivendi do it?

Mobile Merger Mania Mystery Tour: calling in Africa, Turkey, the UK and points worldwide

T-Mobile UK campus, Hatfield, Hertfordshire: uncomfortably close to DTW HQ

Late last month, I turned the gaze of DevelopingTelecomsWatch away from the world's developing countries and emerging markets and focused my attention much closer to home.

Getting all self-indulgent, I described the possible effects of a rumoured T-Mobile UK-Vodafone UK merger on the area where I live. This is because I am personally acquainted with a few people who make the pleasantly short commute from here in St Albans to the T-Mobile campus in nearby Hatfield. Without any real numbers to hand, my sense, then, is that the Deutsche Telekom-owned cellco is a pretty significant employer in this part of the world. So, in a town where the unemployment figure has recently surged upwards, albeit from a very low base, a true merger of the two MNOs is unlikely to be warmly received. I think this is the first telecoms story that I've ever heard being discussed by parents waiting for their kids outside my son's nursery school.

Perhaps a more predictable setting for talk of telecoms M&A activity is Investor's Business Daily, whose writer Reinhardt Krause believes that "after slowing to a crawl in the first half of 2009, deal-making among phone companies is bouncing back, a shift that's playing out in developed and fast-growing emerging markets alike." Krause quotes a former colleague of mine, Thomas Wehmeier, an analyst at Informa Telecoms & Media, who says that "the talking that has been continuously ongoing is finally bubbling up to the surface in the form of actual bids and deals."

Krause cites a number of prospective deals:

• Hutchison Whampoa may seek a merger for some or all of its money-losing operations in Europe, including 3 UK
• The merger talks between Bharti Airtel of India and South Africa's MEA mobile group MTN
• China Mobile being "on the prowl for more deals in Asia"
  
• The much-discussed notion of Zain selling its African operations

When asked about the last of these, Wehmeier expressed surprise, but conceded that "Zain is seeing that operating in the African environment is not simply a way to print money, not matter how impressive the rate of subscription growth."

Tom Elliott, an analyst at Strategy Analytics, meanwhile, says that Zain may be tempted by the huge "one-time gain" it would realise by selling its African assets. As Krause's article states, in 2005, Zain acquired Celtel International's African operations for USD 3.4 billion and, if the current rumours are to be believed, is now looking to sell these (plus some other acquired later) for around USD 10 billion. The even larger sum of USD 12 billion has also been mentioned - and for a very interesting discussion on how that a 12 billion dollar valuation could be calculated, I'd heartily recommend a nice article written by Carlos Valdecantos of Spain-based management consulting and advisory firm mmC Group.

The Zain story is certainly the one to which most time has been dedicated here at DTW but, as discussed, the T-Mobile-Vodafone issue is the one whose impact I'd be most likely to feel in day-to-day life here in London's commuter belt.

The last time I looked at this, I briefly raised reasons why such a deal might not be plausible. These included the idea that UK authorities might be concerned about the market power of the merged operation in a consolidated mobile market and the question of why Deutsche Telkom would offload such a significant asset at the bottom of the market.

Paul Rasmussen of FierceWirelessEurope, writing late last week, has an interesting take on these two concerns. Rasmussen has listened to sources who believe that DT may prefer an asset swap to a sale, favouring the acquisition of a "comparable mobile operator in central or eastern Europe" from a group interested in T-Mobile UK.

Rasmussen cites "insiders" who claim that DT's CEO, René Obermann, is keen to avoid a sale of its UK subsidiary, not least because this would create doubts about the company's ambitions to remain a global player. "Early speculation has placed Vodafone Turkey as a possible candidate", writes Rasmussen.

Vodafone's Turkish operation must count among Big Red's least satisfactory acquisitions. No dent, for example, has been made on Turkcell's leading share of the market, currently estimated at 56.40% by WCIS, which is actually slightly higher than it was at the same time last year.

In March, another Informa Telecoms & Media analyst, Dario Talmesio, profiled the performance of Turkcell and, when analysing the competitive environment in the company's home country, asserted that the cellco's achievements were "facilitated by the exceptionally weak state of Vodafone Turkey."

Talmesio wrote that "Turkcell continued to hold a competitive advantage against its British-owned rival... with Vodafone Turkey scoring particularly low compared with Turkcell in key areas, such as quality of network, commercial distribution and customer satisfaction".

On a personal note, I've travelled to Turkey on business a several times and have had the pleasure of making the acquaintance of people working with just about every significant telecoms operator there, as well as many more in the mobile VAS space and with various consultancy firms. There does seem to be a very strong feeling in Istanbul that Turkcell's dominant position is unlikely to be threatened any time soon. I've even heard the suggestion that Turkish consumers can be quite resistant to foreign brands competing with ones perceived to originate from their home country. Even this seemingly quite intangible advantage might weigh heavily in Turkcell's favour. Personally, I have a fairly strong aversion to slugs and snails - almost a phobia - so, Turkcell's use of the latter in its branding does not float my boat. It doesn't seem to put off the majority of Turkish cell phone users, however.

Turkcell's snail: not to my taste, but works just fine for Turkey's mobile users

One can see, then, why Vodafone might look to retreat gracefully from Turkey. Why, though, would Deutsche Telekom be keen to have a crack at all these problems which Vodafone has seemingly failed to handle? Well, as Paul Rasmussen writes, "such a move would nicely complement Greece's OTE", in which DT has been growing its stake since last year and which has a SE Europe footprint, with mobile operations in a number of Balkan countries.

If we're going to ask what is attractive about Vodafone Turkey, we might equally ask why Vodafone would be interested in T-Mobile UK. Beyond the opportunity to jump instantly to a 40% share of the UK mobile market and into a clear leadership position by market share, does the Deutsche Telekom-owned cellco not come with considerable baggage?

As Paul Rasmussen notes, analysts are beginning to question the value of what T-Mobile UK has to offer. He writes that "while the company has around 16 million customers, it is largely made up of an unstable base of prepaid consumers who can switch carriers easily to chase the cheapest or best value plans" and notes that "T-Mobile also generates around 45 per cent of its cash flow from its MNVO deal with Virgin Mobile, a deal that could easily evaporate if a new owner ruffled Virgin's sensitive feathers."

Bearing all of this in mind, you'd have to ask why media speculation abounds about the UK's two other leading mobile operator, O2 and Orange being interested in T-Mobile UK.

One suggestion raised by Paul Rasmussen is that this stems from each operator seeking to "spoil the ambitions of the others", leading to "the winner overpaying while the losers then complain bitterly to the regulator in an effort to confuse and delay the acquisition." Rasmussen argues that "The 'losers' could then attack the unsettled T-Mobile subscriber base with attractive offers and packages. Why so cynical, Paul?

Scary stuff.

Let's keep watching.

Mobile Merger Mania Mystery Tour: calling in Africa, Turkey, the UK and points worldwide

Zain Africa Speculation Watch: Episode 7

Dr Bahabri of HiTS Telecom: 'highly leveraged' Zain has been in talks with Vodafone, China Mobile - (photo from Comm.ae)

It's a matter of policy here at DevelopingTelecomsWatch not to write anything actively inflammatory. Controversy is not the watchword. There's no harm, however, in merely repeating contentious statements made by others. Is there?

One man seemingly unafraid of rattling cages is Dr Sultan A. Bahabri, Chairman of HiTS Telecom, the self-styled 'new opportunity communications company' that has invested in Brazil, Spain, Saudi Arabia and in several African markets.

Late last week, Bahabri spoke with the telecoms sector's very own man of mystery 'the Informer', offering his hard-hitting opinions on a range of issues. One of these was the recently much-discussed question of whether pan-MEA mobile player Zain is really going to flog its supposedly strategically vital African assets to some lucky punter.

Bahabri alleges that last year Zain was in serious talks with both Vodafone and China Mobile, claiming that the Kuwait/Bahrain-headquartered group is "highly leveraged and that leverage is going to be heavy on their shoulders for years to come."

The HiTS Telecom Chairman went on to make some fairly critical remarks about the manner in which Zain entered the Saudi Arabian market two years ago. The price paid for the country's third licence to operate was a whopping USD 6 billion, at a time when mobile market penetration was close to 80%. As Gavin Patterson of Informa Telecoms & Media wrote in his recently-penned Zain Group Q4 2008 update, mobile penetration in Saudi Arabia had passed the 100% mark by the time the third operator launched services. Patterson also saves us the bother of working out the cost of the licence per inhabitant of Saudi Arabia - USD 226: the world's most expensive on a per capita basis.

According to the Informer, Bahabri claims that his company also bid just over USD 4 billion in the Saudi Arabian auction, but that he could not have justified the bigger sum which Zain ended up spending.

Zain's management have not failed to notice sceptical remarks about their Saudi operation. In February last year, the firm's Chief Communications Officer Ibrahim Adel was interviewed by Mobile Communications International magazine, acknowledging that the move had been dismissed by some as one which that simply did not justify the expense. Adel noted that some observers had dubbed his firm's actions as a case of "crazy Kuwaitis, spending crazy money".

Adel argued, however, that the licence win was essential: "Saudi is a key strategic market for us. We couldn’t not be there."

Keep that word in mind: strategic - and fast-forward to the more recent critical remarks made by Dr Bahabri of HiTS Telecom. In last week's no-holds-barred chat with the Informer, Bahabri joked that "when you can’t think of a reason to justify that sort of spend, you just call it 'strategic'" - using the word as a barb, it seems to me. Many operators, he went on to add, have "a very dangerous combination of ego and cash. That leads to many mistakes."

Tough talk. Does it invite others to watch HiTS Telecoms closely and speak in similarly strong language should Dr Bahabri's organisation ever make moves which leave it open to criticism?

Returning to Dr Bahabri's suggestion that "highly leveraged" Zain was in talks with potential purchasers of parts of its business as far back as one year ago, fresh rumours were circulated yesterday that a sale of some sort is now on the cards - Bloomberg's Ambereen Choudhury writes that the telco has asked Swiss bank UBS AG to consider a possible sale of its African division, which it values at about USD 10 billion. The source? "Three people familiar with the plans."

These mysterious people told Choudhury that UBS "will oversee a review that may lead to a sale of all or part of the unit" and that "Zain is yet to decide on a sale, which would exclude its Sudanese operations."

In previous episodes of Zain Africa Speculation Watch we have considered the merits of various suitors that could step forward should Zain indeed decide that a sale is the best way forward. Of these, I noted that French telecoms and media conglomerate Vivendi has been dismissed by some analysts as being unlikely to be able to raise the necessary funds for an acquisition as significant as Zain's African unit.

Bloomberg's Choudhury, however, takes the time to consider a Vivendi bid and his unnamed sources allege that the company has actually approached Zain in recent months for exploratory talks about the latter's African division. According to Choudhury, Vivendi, which owns 53 percent of Maroc Telecom, has said it wants to revisit the idea of expanding its presence in emerging markets, having scrapped previous discussions about buying a stake in Dubai-based Oger Telecom in 2007.

Of the rumours feeding into Zain Africa Speculation Watch the mini-series, Ambereen Choudhury's are about the most specific. I have no idea, however, if they are the most reliable or credible. So, again I invite you to watch this space. Don't touch that dial. No flipping. etc. etc.

Zain Africa Speculation Watch: Episode 7

Report tips China Mobile, MTN, America Movil as 'best postioned to grow' - but does not consider Middle Eastern, Indian players

graphic from Telegeography's GlobalComms Insight

New research from TeleGeography’s GlobalComms Insight includes predictions about wireless and broadband subscriber growth globally for the next five years. A key finding seems to be that "growth in the value of the telecoms services market will not keep pace with subscriber growth." This feels right. As the report authors note, subscriber growth these days largely comes from countries with very low GDP per capita - i.e. emerging markets.

This is all fine. I am curious, however, to know how the people behind TeleGeography's GlobalComms Insight selected the eight leading service providers studied in the report and positioned on the graph above. It is not without value to consider the global competitive position and the growth prospects of China Mobile, MTN, America Movil, Vodafone, Telefonica, Verizon, BT and NTT. But wouldn't this report be a lot more interesting if telcos headquartered in the Middle East were put into the mix? I hear so many people articulating the view that these relatively cash-rish players are among the best placed to take advantage of the current challenging economic climate - in terms of finding and securing acquisition targets at knock down prices from sellers wanting to raise cash ASAP.

Where, then, would Etisalat, QTel or Zain sit on the graph?

One aspect of this report which does seem useful is ensuring that China Mobile is discussed. The authors call the giant cellco "one company that has managed to buck the general trend, thanks to the blistering mobile subscriber growth in its home market" and note that even this company, "the world’s largest wireless service provider by subscribers is feeling the pressure, as evidenced by last week’s news that it will expand its global footprint by buying a stake in FarEasTone of Taiwan."

I'd also be interested to see where the report authors would place Bharti Airtel in their calculations. Back in February, I considered the view that the rapidly diversifying market-leading Indian MNO might likewise be compelled by competitive pressures at home to look more seriously at international growth opportunities.

Report tips China Mobile, MTN, America Movil as 'best postioned to grow' - but does not consider Middle Eastern, Indian players

Bharti Airtel to go international in 2009? Could competitive pressures at home make it a must-do strategy?

Earlier this month, I was wondering where MENA region-headquartered groups such as Orascom Telecom, Etisalat, Zain etc. might next go shopping for extensions to their empires. I discussed the view that the current economic climate has created a nice opportunity for Gulf-based telcos. That view was echoed this week by my former Informa Telecoms & Media colleague Nick Jotischky, whom I last saw in Dubai last December at GSM>3G Middle East, the final Com World Series event in which I was involved before leaving the company.

My guess for a while has been that any telcos struggling in the current climate may be prepared to sell off assets at rather lower prices that they would consider in happier times, hence the opportunity for MENA region players. Moreoever, writing this week, Nick notes that traditonally strong and expansionist mobile players such as Orange/France Telecom and Telenor are now more reluctant to get involved in further acquisitions activity, which may make the prices of potential targets lower still for Gulf region telcos looking to expand further. In Nick's article, he wonders whether powerhouse cellcos from China and India might also have the appetite for global expansion. "Some say the global mobile telecoms industry could go the way of the steel sector, which is largely dominated by emerging market players," writes Nick.

Nick notes that Bharti Airtel and China Mobile are the leaders of the two fastest-growing mobile markets in terms of subscriptions, with India adding just over 100 million subscriptions in 2008 and China 89 million. Nick feels this means that these two giant cellcos are therefore focusing on their domestic markets, noting that China Mobile is also busy rolling out its TD-SCDMA network. Bharti Airtel, Nick asserts, "has intense - even brutal - competition to contend with while preparing to launch its 3G network."

One element of the tough competitive environment in India is the fact that state-owned operators BSNL and MTNL have beaten Bharti Airtel and other private sector MNOs to the punch in terms of going to market with 3G services. According to a telecoms.com article, BSNL has rolled out 3G services in an additional eleven cities following the launch of its first 3G service in Chennai earlier this month. MTNL, meanwhile, has launched 3G services in central New Delhi with the stated aim of attracting 200,000 to the service within two years.

The article notes that "if BSNL and MTNL were to have a substantial head start over 3G rivals, particularly if the spectrum auctions, as many industry commentators now believe, are unlikely to take place until the end of this year, the licences would surely look less attractive to investors weighing up India's 3G opportunity." If this has the effect of driving down the amount of money the Indian Government is able to raise through the long-delayed auctions, the article continues, this too could work to the advantage of BSNL and MTNL because the price they both have to pay for their 3G spectrum has to match the highest winning auction bids in each of the respective circles.

As the telecoms.com article also notes, BSNL also has a first-mover advantage when it comes to BWA spectrum because while the BWA auctions are scheduled to take place the same time as the 3G licence awards, "BSNL is already sitting on a chunk of pan-Indian 20MHz spectrum in the 2.5GHz band." Again, the article continues, BSNL does not have to pay for its BWA spectrum until the BWA auctions take place.

In the mobile space, Bharti Airtel, with 26.38% of subscriptions according to the World Cellular Information Service, leads a select group of larger Indian cellcos. Other major players include Vodafone Essar (18.77% market share), Reliance Communications (16.63%) and Idea Cellular (11.71%). Of the two state-owned 3G early movers, BSNL is another significant player, occupying fourth place in the market with 12.74% of subscriptions. MTNL, which is also active in wireline telephony and CDMA WLL, is a much smaller GSM mobile player, with only 1.20% of subscriptions.

Of the few further existing opertators with single-digit market share, one in particular has been in the news quite a lot of late. CDMA network operator Tata Teleservices (7.01% market share) has announced that it will be seting up 100 new cell sites in the state of Gujarat by August, according to a Business Standard story today. This seems to be the latest component of a drive to extend the geographical reach of the Tata network. In October, Global Mobile Daily reported the company's plans to expand its services into the Jammu and Kashmir operating circle by the end of November, thereby becoming the fourth operator in that market alongside BSNL, Bharti Airtel and Aircel. The war chest for this expansion will be boosted by the USD 822.67 million which Tata Teleservices raised by selling a 49% stake in its tower unit to Quippo Telecom Infrastructure, a deal which was announced in January.

The CDMA operator has certainly been deemed attractive by NTT DoCoMo of Japan, an existing shareholder which has had a move to add a further 20.25% stake in the business approved by India's cabinet, according to a Global Mobile Daily story of 24th February. This stake was up for grabs because its previous owner, the broadband player Tata Communications was strapped for cash and had pressured the Indian Government to allow the sale of a share in the CDMA mobile operator, according to an earlier Global Mobile Daily article, which reported that Tata Communications has been "particularly hard hit by the credit crunch and that the operator has told the Department of Telecommunications that it will be nearly impossible for it to carry out its business plans unless it receives new funding."

Government approval was needed because the state holds a 26.12% stake in Tata Communications, formerly known as VSNL, and was therefore able to veto the sale of the company's stake in Tata Teleservices, in which DoCoMo already owned a 26% share. According to yet another GMD story in January, Tata Communications is also planning a USD 51 million bond issue to help finance its bid for WiMAX spectrum.

Tata Teleservices is aiming to grow further by addressing the relatively untapped rural market, having done a deal with Impetus Infotech India to launch services for value-added services aimed at farmers and related communities, providing updated information on current prices of commodities across the country. According to the Business Standard article, Tata Teleservices expects around 60-70% of new additions to its subscriber base to come from rural areas.

Tata Teleservices may also ratchet up the competitive pressure in India's mobile market by enabling Virgin Mobile India, in which the CDMA MNO owns a 50% stake, to enter the GSM space. Prior to reading an Economic Times article earlier this week, I had not realised that Tata would be following Reliance Communications in migrating from CDMA to GSM family technology. This mobile standards migration seems to me quite reminiscent of what has happened in Brazil, where the operator Vivo, which had been the lone CDMA player, chose to make the move to GSM in order to compete more effectively with its rivals.

At present, Virgin Mobile is positioned as India’s first youth-centric mobile service, according to this week's Economic Times piece, and its services are offered on the Tata Teleservices CDMA network via a brand franchisee arrangement.

"Our agreement with TTSL is technology neutral. At present, our services are restricted to CDMA. Once TTSL unveils its GSM network, we will extend the Virgin services into GSM as well," says Virgin Mobile India CEO M.A. Madhusudan. The article states that Virgin Mobile is now gearing up to launch its GSM service as soon as Tata Teleservices does. "Nearly 73% of the Indian mobile market is controlled by GSM operators. An entry into GSM will help us to expand our addressable market and also increase our average revenue per user. Currently, our ARPU is nearly 30% higher than the industry average," said Mr Madhusudan. The article continues: "In a bid to expand its portfolio, Virgin is also keen to enter the business phone segment", qouting Mr Madhusudan: "We are in talks with multiple handset vendors, including Research in Motion... there are also plans to launch data cards."

CDMA operators migrating to GSM. Virgin Mobile beefing up its MVNO play. State-owned operators stealing a march in the 3G space and in the WiMAX services arena. I imagine this is what Nick Jotischky meant by 'brutal' domestic competion for Bharti Airtel. I can therefore understand speculation about India's mobile market leader looking beyond the borders of its home country for growth opportunities. As Nick noted this week, the Indian cellco has shown its hand before, having failed in a previous bid to acquire South Africa's MTN. Nick feels that "as an operator with proven experience of coping with the lowest tariffs in the world while sustaining growth, Bharti would have an innovative approach to the challenges presented by African markets" and argues that "at the root of this innovation in India is Bharti's use of outsourcing, in not only its network and IT functions but also its call-center and customer-relationship services." Nick feels that this kind approach would be an alternative to the one taken thus far by African operators and says that "it will be worth watching how new entrant Econet Wireless Kenya fares, having pledged to use outsourcing as a key strategy."

Nick feels that China Mobile, meanwhile, may be encouraged by recent success in Pakistan and go on to expand elsewhere in Asia. China Mobile's Pakistan outpost, CM Pak (branded Zong), has, in Nick's view, built its success on cheap tariffs and an aggressive network rollout plan. Nick notes that "a sign of that success is the fact that in 3Q08, CM Pak added more subscriptions than any of its rivals."

Nick conludes his article by predicting that "we can expect China Mobile to stretch its Asian coverage and Bharti [Airtel] to return to Africa," but feels it would probably be premature for either company to reach out any farther. I have thought about the China Mobile case a lot less, but having considered the many competitive pressures endured by Bharti Airtel at home, my guess is that the Indian cellco must be thinking very seriously about where it might extend its footprint.

Bharti Airtel to go international in 2009? Could competitive pressures at home make it a must-do strategy?