Russia & CIS Com 2009: a good place to do business in the region

I'd like to pass on my good wishes to everyone working to deliver another great Russia & CIS Com conference and exhibition in Moscow this year. The 2009 iteration of this useful annual event takes place 2-3 June at the usual venue, the Radisson SaS Slavjanskaya Hotel.

It was my pleasure to produce the 2007 and 2008 versions of this event during my enjoyable stint with Informa Telecoms & Media so I will be interested to hear about how a new wrinkle in the design of the agenda works out.

We observed last year that while delegate numbers were strong on the first day, the crowd was noticeably thinner on the second day. We were keen to improve this situation in 2009 and beyond for the sponsors and exhibitors whose support makes the event possible. I think we worked out what was causing the problem.

With most of the events in the Com World Series, of which Russia & CIS Com is part, the conference gathers delegates from quite a large number of countries. The Moscow event, in contrast, tends to appeal mainly to telecoms sector executives from the Russian Federation, Ukraine and Belarus only. Quite a high percentage of visitors come from the many telecoms businesses based in Moscow itself. Whereas out-of-town visitors to a conference tend to spend most of the two days of any event at the venue, those based in the venue city find it harder not to keep stepping out to keep on top of their day-to-day responsibilities. I think for a lot of the Muscovites in attendance, one day works out as a reasonable time commitment to the conference, but two days is a bit more of a stretch.

The device we dreamed up to resolve this was to split the agenda into two distinct chunks - each a conference within a conference, I suppose. So this year's Russia & CIS Com features one highly cellular-centric day of discussions and another which is focused more on wireline and fixed-wireless broadband, IPTV etc. Even in this age of accelerating convergence between fixed and mobile networks/services/technologies, we thought there is still a meaningful distinction between the "mobile crowd" and the "fixed crowd", at least for now. My hunch is that this will work well, delivering two somewhat overlapping crowds across the two days. I expect to hear that sponsors and exhibitors have gained from this and I daresay my former colleagues have briefed them on how to maximise the networking opportunity.

One returnee from the 2008 speaker panel is Konstantin Tikar, General Director of the Belarusian incumbent fixed-line operator, Beltelecom, whose mobile unit, CDMA operator Belcel has recently struck a revenue share deal with Velcom, the local subsidiary of mobilkom austria. According to a recent Total Telecom article, market-leading GSM operator Velcom will soon begin selling mobile broadband services in partnership with its rival Belcel. The article states that the 50/50 revenue-sharing agreement will see Velcom take control of Belcel's retail mobile broadband sales and customer service operation, while Belcel will manage and operate the infrastructure side of the business. Services will run on Belcel's EV-DO network, which currently supports data rates of up to 3.1 Mbps. With the country's GSM operators having yet to deploy W-CDMA networks of their own, this deal enables Velcom to get a 3G mobile broadband proposition to market ahead of rivals MTS Belarus and Turkcell-backed Life :) Belarus.

My guess is that Belcel will benefit greatly from having the much more successful Velcom handling the sales and customer service side of things. The CDMA operator's mobile market share has remained stuck at under 2% since the summer of 2006. Fifty percent of something significant has to be better than one hundred percent of not very much, I guess.

Mr Tikar is quoted in the Total Telecom story as saying "The cooperation [announced] today allows Belcel to increase the quality and capacity of its network significantly," while Velcom CEO Helmut Duhs observes that the agreement "provides our customers with a mature mobile broadband service and future-proof option to upgrade, once even more advanced technology becomes available in Belarus."

I'd like to congratulate my former colleagues on securing some strong speakers for Russia & CIS Com 2009. Among those joining Mr Tikar on stage at the conference will be:

• Gulnara Khasianova, General Director, SkyLink
• Donna Kordner, CEO, Tele2 Russia
• Michael Chobanyan, Managing Director, CDMA Ukraine
• Garrett Johnston, Group Director of Strategic Marketing, MTS
• Pavel Kuznetsov, CEO, Central Telegraph

If you aim to do business in that part of the world, I'd urge you to build a trip around a visit to the conference and exhibition.

Russia & CIS Com 2009: a good place to do business in the region

India's WiMAX/3G debate revisited

It does seem to be India week here on Developing Telecoms Watch. When I posted a link to this blog at the Mobile Consultants LinkedIn group, a member who has worked as an RF networks engineer for a number of the country's cellular operators was very keen to assert in response that his market is "the blue eyed baby for the [global] telecom sector nowadays and adding 8 million subs per month". In my respondent's view, interesting developments to look out for in India will include:

• Site sharing to save OPEX and CAPEX, with "some operators [having] set annual targets of 50-60% incremental sharing".
• As a result of looking at carried traffic and site utilization, "operators are taking a call to switch off some sites during night time to save OPEX".
• Single billing systems for all services provided by an operator, such as mobile, DTH, data usage, IPTV etc.
• Operators identifying common weak coverage areas and areas in high security zones - and planning single sites instead of deploying multiple sites in those areas.
• Operators waiting for number portability "to be deployed ASAP to maximize their revenues".

I concluded Sunday's India-themed post by choosing to infer from a recent report by consultants BDA that there seems to be reasonable case for WiMAX and an even stronger one for 3G in India. Since then I've read articles in which the prospects for both are enthusiastically talked up.

Making the case for 3G, in an interview in an interview with Business Line yesterday was Mr P. Balaji, Ericsson India's VP of Marketing and Strategy. Balaji asserts that Indian operators will be able to roll out services with minimal additional infrastructure costs and that 3G will help to bridge the urban-rural digital divide. "Telemedicine, e-education and e-governance can be offered through 3G in rural pockets," says Ericsson's Balaji, "and this is bound to improve the quality of life of the people."

Asked how 3G stacks up against WiMAX, Balaji states "we believe the Government should leave it to the market forces and not dictate technology choices" and that in his opinion "3G will score in the Indian telecom market because it offers greater economies of scale, faster time to market and multiplicity of handsets".

This is not very surprising. Outlined in a white paper released last month, the Ericsson view of comparisons between WiMAX and HSPA can is as follows: "While the peak data rates, spectral efficiency and network architecture of HSPA Evolution and Mobile WiMAX are similar, HSPA offers better coverage. In short, Mobile WiMAX does not offer any technology advantage over HSPA. What is more, HSPA is a proven mobile broadband technology deployed in more than 100 commercial networks... [and] can be built out using existing GSM radio network sites and is a software upgrade of installed W-CDMA networks. Compared with other alternatives, HSPA is the clear and undisputed choice for mobile broadband services."

The Swedish vendor certainly seems to have lost enthusiasm for the IEEE 802.16 family of standards since making extremely positive noises when joining the WiMAX Forum in December 2004.

Feeling more upbeat about WiMAX in India is research and consulting house Strategy Analytics, whose recent study sees the country's WiMAX subscriber base hitting 14 million by Year 2013 and growing annually by nearly 130%. An Economic Times article on Saturday indicated that the Strategy Analytics report predicts initial investment in WiMAX ventures will top $500 million in India. The US-based research firm feel that after initial deployments primarily in major urban areas pockets, "WiMAX will find relatively greater utility and less competition from competing technologies in smaller towns and villages."

This last point seems to go head-to-head with the claims made by Ericsson's Balaji regarding his envisioned role for 3G networks in India's rural areas. I wonder who will turn out to be right? Or will it be a case of both being half-right?

Another thing for me to wonder about: I wonder if tomorrow will be the day when I finally managed to discuss something other than India's WiMAX and 3G prospects here...

India's WiMAX/3G debate revisited