News, views and commentary from the telecoms sector across emerging markets and developing countries worldwide
Showing posts with label ByCell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ByCell. Show all posts

Friday, 4 September 2009

India update: loose ends from previous entries

MTS: Russian cellco's Indian operation - world's first CDMA2000 1x Advanced deployment

The time is fast approaching when I'll want to revisit the twists and turns of the much-discussed MTN-Bharti Airtel merger. That mooted deal, though, is by no means the only interesting story on the Indian telecoms scene so in the meantime I'd like to follow up on a number of issues covered in previous articles here.

Early last month, this blog discussed the desire of Scandinavian telecoms firm Telenor firm to secure a controlling interest in the Indian mobile operator in which it is a shareholder. A stumbling block had been the concerns of the country's security agencies, worried about the Norwegian firm's links to Bangladesh and Pakistan, both neighbouring states inside which terrorist attacks on Indian targets have been planned. When DTW last picked up this story, it looked as though a solution might be on offer - in the form of the transaction being approved on the condition that none of the staff who have worked at Telenor's Pakistan operation will be employed in India. Courtesy of India's Economic Times, I learned yesterday that this proposal to allow Telenor to increase its stake in Unitech Wireless has been sent to the Indian cabinet for approval. Doubtless the Norwegian firm will be hopeful of a positive outcome.

Another recent India-focused DTW article explored how the Government's security fears may be set to affect other telecoms businesses. That piece mentioned the case of ByCell, a Russian-backed firm that has been prevented from entering the Indian mobile services market, with security concerns about the company and its shareholders being the deal-breaker.

Now, another Indian telecoms firm with links to Russia is also the subject of worries over foreign ownership rules. Sistema Shyam Teleservice (now branded MTS India), a CDMA cellco in which Russian conglomerate Sistema has a controlling stake, has been asked to seek fresh approval for its wholly-owned subsidiary Shyam Internet Services, an ISP. According to an Economic Times article yesterday, the subsidiary never secured the mandatory Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) approval.

The article states that the issue came to light when the cellco's ISP subsidiary, which currently offers services only in Rajasthan, sought approval from the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) to be a pan-India player. MTS India has reportedly told the DoT that since FIPB had previously approved Sistema's 74% stake in the company, it was therefore "assumed that this approval covered all wholly-owned subsidiaries." MTS representatives seem to be confident that this issue can be resolved quickly and without much fuss, but it's worth pointing out that this is not the first time the cellco has run into trouble over failure to obtain FIPB clearances.

Early last year, according to the Economic Times piece, Sistema grew its stake in the Indian mobile operator to 73.97% despite only having got FIPB approval for a stake of 51%. This was resolved, but perhaps the Sistema people will be hoping that these trangressions have not tried the patience of the Indian authorities too far.

On the mobile side, MTS India remains a vigorous proponent of CDMA technology as a good fit for the country. On Tuesday, the operator announced its membership of the CDMA Development Group (CDG), the international consortium of CDMA service providers, manufacturers, application developers and content providers whose roles are to ensure interoperability among systems and encourage the adoption of CDMA2000 wireless technology worldwide. The previous day, the cellco had announced its plan to adopt 1X Advanced technology to support its growth plans. An announcement about the completion and publication of specifications for CDMA2000 1x Advanced was only made last month, so MTS India's claim to be the first service provider in the world to offer this "future-ready technology" seems credible.

CDMA2000 1x Advanced is intended to enable best-in-class and simultaneous voice and high speed EV-DO data services. MTS India CEO Vsevolod Rozanov says "with a need to offer uncompromising, seamless call connectivity with fewer call drops, and data services at ever faster speeds, operators are in search of solutions that utilize limited spectrum more efficiently, to be able to support a larger subscriber-base on it. 1X Advanced is designed to meet both these needs and will help MTS to significantly increase its capacity to provide outstandingly clear voice quality to its growing subscriber base."

This operator, then, seems bullish about the prospects for its advanced services. Last month, DTW covered the apparently less successful efforts of India's two major state-owned telecoms businesses to compete in that space. That article noted that both BSNL and MTNL have registered very low subscriber numbers for their 3G offerings, failing to capitalise on the first-mover advantage they should be enjoying - India's private sector mobile operators continue to wait for oft-delayed licence auctions to take place. I am not sure to what degree high handset prices have been a barrier to consumer adoption of the state sector telcos' 3G services - in previous articles here, it has been noted that the two state-owned companies have a rather lower ARPU subscriber base than some of their private sector rivals. If the price of devices is a major stumbling block, MTNL will be hoping that its recently launched own brand 3G handset - priced at around USD 110 - will have a positive impact.

MTNL is also looking to develop its 3G play in partnership with franchisees, whose role will be to acquire, serve and retain customers and provide customer care, according to a Business Standard article of 16th July. Two interested parties have emerged - Virgin Mobile and Spice Group. The former is well known globally for its MVNOs in the UK, Australia, Canada, France, South Africa and the USA. The Virgin Mobile brand has also been present in India for a little while, with services offered via the CDMA and GSM networks of Tata Teleservices.

Whether the franchise route will turn out to be the best way forward for MTNL remains to be seen. The DTW article which covered the public sector telcos failing to sell good numbers of 3G subscriptions also mentioned the criticism BSNL has received for selecting the franchising model for its WiMAX deployment. A vocal critic was the WiMAX Forum's top representative in India, who has asked the telco to consider how much revenue it may be foregoing by employing this approach.

This criticism, then, implies that the franchisee in this arrangement can make a tidy sum. Perhaps with this in mind, and presumably encouraged by its existing arrangement with BSNL, wireless solutions provider Harris Stratex is eyeing a role in MTNL's WiMAX franchisee project, according to Thomas K. Thomas of Business Line, writing recently.

In the case of 3G mobile services, perhaps MTNL's management would be encouraged by how successful Virgin Mobile has been in the UK and be attracted to the idea of working with a company whose brand value can prove very attractive for consumers. That said, in April this blog discussed how much less successful the Virgin Mobile MVNO in South Africa has been. In terms of market maturity (measured by mobile penetration), Virgin Mobile South Africa made its debut rather later than its UK counterpart had done some years before, thereby finding itself needing to win custom away from the incumbent MNOs. I don't have figures to hand, but I daresay that here in the UK, the Virgin-branded MVNO was the first supplier of mobile services to many of the customers it signed up. In India, mobile penetration might look attractively low to Virgin Mobile, causing the group to hopeful about experiencing growth more akin to the UK scenario than the frustrating South African one. I wonder, however, how strong an affinity for the Virgin brand exists in the minds of Indian consumers. Here in the UK, the brand is associated with a plethora of other products and services and its founder, the charismatic Sir Richard Branson, is often described as one of this country's most admired citizens. Does this brand resonate much more strongly here in Britain than, say, India?

It remains to be seen whether these franchising deals or the launch of new devices will do much to improve the fortunes of India's two ailing state sector telcos. For Amit Gupta of telecoms and IT advisory firm Ovum, none of this is as important as the need to privatise both BSNL and MTNL. In a recent opinion piece, he argues that "political intervention, a bureaucratic culture and pre-liberalization mindset are the root causes for BSNL and MTNL’s poor performance". Even with control handed to new investors, argues Gupta, "the challenge to transform BSNL and MTNL from state owned sick companies into customer centric service providers will be daunting". He feels that "due to the size and complexity of these companies, it won't be possible for an outsider to manage change without the cooperation of the existing employees", which could be tricky if we believe the argument that "at the same time, investors will have to cut the flab from a bloated workforce." These concerns notwithstanding, Gupta continues, "privatization is the only economically viable option" if these companies are to be saved from "their eventual demise."

Amit Gupta argues against the value of the Indian Government merely divesting stakes in the two operators while retaining control. He feels that this is inadequate. I imagine, then, that he would warn off any potential bidders for minority stakes in either opco. One such might be the giant US telco AT&T, which is reportedly considering a bid for a chunk of BSNL.

I've written so much about India on this blog since February that I daresay other loose ends from previous entries may need tying up soon. Watch this space. The next article on India may well zero on that mega-merger whose developments have rumbled on all summer.
Share/Save/Bookmark

Wednesday, 12 August 2009

India Week continues at DTW

This is turning into 'India Week' here at DevelopingTelecomsWatch. Today's musings begin by revisiting yesterday's discussion here about the imposition of Mobile Number Portability (MNP) in the country. We will also consider - not for the first time - the ways in which the Indian Government's concerns about national security might lessen the appeal of this vast, growing market for foreign telecoms groups.

The reason we are returning to the MNP debate so quickly is that yesterday saw an open house discussion in Hyderabad on this theme. Hosted by the TRAI, India's telecoms regulatory body. This rejoiced in the snappy title 'Determination of Port Transaction Charge, dipping charge and porting charge for mobile number portability'. The surrounding media coverage provides more information on the range of concerns expressed by India's cellcos.

Speaking to an Economic Times reporter at the workshop was TRAI Chairman SJ Sharma, who said he expects MNP to go live on December 1st. While Sharma is confident that his agency will have its MNP regulations in place by the end of August, he expressed the belief that some of the operators do not seem to have ordered enabling equipment yet, meaning that a delay of 2-3 months is likely.

Yesterday, ahead of the Hyderabad discussions, we considered the estimated cost one operator had calculated for the implementation of MNP. State-owned BSNL had come up with a USD 250 million estimate, complaining about this cost in light of its contention that only 2% of "elite customers" are likely to use the facility.

Today, drawing on an article from K.V. Kurmanath of the Business Line, we can see how BSNL's numbers stack up against the estimates of some of its competitors in the mobile space.

Reliance Communications
, and Tata Teleservices have indicated that they expected MNP-related expenditure to the tune of USD 20.6 million each. Vodafone India has come up with the much larger figure of USD 72.3 million. Much lower numbers than those mentioned by BSNL, then, but still pretty significant sums of money. I invite anyone with a view on this to offer an explanation for why this set of estimates varies so much.

"The regulator asked the service providers to send in their points on these issues by Tuesday," Mr T. R. Dua, Deputy Director-General of the Cellular Operators’ Association of India, told Business Line, whose article states that "keeping in mind the huge expenditure", the telecos want the TRAI to ensure that they are compensated for their "huge investments".

Let's see, then, if December 1st really is the date after which Indian mobile users can elect to switch their cellular providers while keeping their phone numbers.

In the meantime, I want to consider once again how the Indian authorities' concerns about national security are impacting on the telecoms sector.

In a recent piece here about worldwide developments across the footprint of Scandinavian telecoms group Telenor, I noted that the company had been facing difficulties around establishing a controlling interest in Unitech Wireless, the start-up Indian cellco in which it currently has a minority stake. For India's security agencies, the stumbling block was Telenor's presence in Pakistan and Bangladesh - apparently a cause for concern in light of strained relations with both of these neighbouring countries.

Telenor's immediate problem appears to have been resolved with the Indian Home Ministry's suggestion that security clearance for a bigger stake in Unitech Wireless up could be provided on the condition that none of the staff who have worked at the Norwegian firm's Pakistan operation are employed in India. Other security concerns affecting the telecoms sector more broadly, however, continue to be aired pretty regularly.

For example, all telecoms firms present in India may find themselves subject to further personnel restrictions. Late last week, Joji Thomas Philip of the Economic Times wrote that India's intelligence agencies now want all telcos to have a native Indian in the post of Chief Operating Officer. At present, only operators' CTOs need be a resident Indian citizens, while foreigners are allowed to hold all other key positions such as Chairman, MD, CEO and CFO, subject to clearance from the Home Ministry on a yearly basis.

If enforced soon, this proposed new regulation might not make a big impact right away because, as Philip notes, none of the existing telcos currently has a foreign COO.

This is not to say that such restrictions will have no impact, however. An article in today's Financial Times goes as far as stating that such stringent personnel requirements would lessen the appeal of India for foreign strategic investors and will restrict the freedom of companies already operating in India to make use of existing foreign expertise within their global organisations.

The article also contends that such restrictions on management positions could complicate corporate merger and acquisition activity such as Bharti Airtel's planned tie-up with MTN, the South African telecoms firm with interests across and beyond Africa. This would just add to the concerns of some analysts who are already sceptical about the wisdom of that proposed deal for Bharti Airtel shareholders. On Monday, India's Financial Express noted that day's 4.8% drop in the market-leading cellco's share price, which seems to have been triggered by worries that the company will increase by 5-10% its offer to buy a stake in MTN. The article quotes Sonam Udas, VP Research at BRICS Securities, who says: "we don't understand the logic for this deal at all. Why does Bharti want to change from a company with a net cash position of USD 1 billion to a debt-ridden firm? We do not buy the argument the deal is going to add value. There is nothing in the deal to highlight as adding strategic value."

Operators may not be the only telecoms value chain participants affected by the Indian Government's security concerns. Joji Thomas Philip writes that the Home Ministry fears that "suspect vendors may install back-door entries, remote logic facilities and also design Trojan horses in networks and hardware. This could be used to remotely bring down the network or to monitor it." Philip states that the agencies are particularly concerned about Chinese vendors.

One definite casualty of all this worry about national security is Swiss-registered firm ByCell. On Saturday, the Economic Times confirmed that after much wrangling, the company is to be prevented from entering the Indian mobile services market, with security concerns about the company and its shareholders being the deal-breaker.

A busy week for Indian market watchers so far, then. Let's see if the rest of the week has enough action in store to warrant another look here at DTW.
Share/Save/Bookmark

Thursday, 23 July 2009

Pakistan: 5 (really 6 [or 7?]) becomes 4 (or 5 or 6?)?

China Mobile: keen to drive consolidation of Pakistan's mobile market?

With a population of around 173 million and a mobile penetration rate of just 55.01% (according to WCIS), Pakistan would appear to be an attractive place to be for multinational telecoms groups. Some very significant individuals, however, have recently expressed the belief that market conditions are too tough to support the current number of mobile operators competing in the country. A specific suggestion about a possible merger between operators has also surfaced in the last few days.

According to Pakistani news portal Dawn.com, Telenor is considering selling its operation in Pakistan to China Mobile, which already has a presence in the market in the form of the MNO Zong. The Dawn.com article contends that the Norway-headquartered international telcoms group has been deliberating a withdrawal from Pakistan for some time because of "security issues".

Shortly after this report surfaced, Reuters was carrying a 'no comment'/denial from Telenor. The Reuters snippet notes that ARPU at Telenor Pakistan was the lowest of all its operations around Europe and Asia but that the number of subscribers grew by nearly 20% year-on-year. Why, then, would the Norwegian group consider this move?

Let me put forward a possibly outlandish theory, which also relates to security concerns - but security concerns in India rather than in neighbouring Pakistan.

A few days ago, the Economic Times ran an article about how the Indian Government has withdrawn approval for ByCell, a company "promoted by Russian businessmen", to offer telecoms services in the country. The company had planned to set up as a GSM mobile operator in areas including Assam, Bihar, Orissa and West Bengal, but seems to have endured a long struggle to get the green light to do so. As far as I can make out from this and other articles, the Indian Foreign Investment Permission Board (FIPB) has been concerned by the security implications of ByCell's ownership structure and its sources of funding for some time.

The same Economic Times piece also indicates that the FIPB is uncomfortable with the idea of Telenor increasing its stake (currently 49%) in cellco Unitech Wireless. Again, "security concerns" are the cause of the problem - in this case to do with the fact that Telenor operates in Pakistan, with which India has long had an uneasy relationship.

This, then, is my possibly highly simplistic and implausible theory: Telenor sees India as a far richer prize than Pakistan and therefore considers selling its Pakistani operation to China Mobile in order to pave the way for establishing a full controlling stake in Unitech Wireless. Crazy? Maybe. Or maybe I'm onto something. This is just a wild stab in the dark, so who knows?

Either way, China Mobile certainly seems keen to accelerate the growth of its share of Pakistan's mobile subs (currently estimated at 7.20% by WCIS) by acquiring a rival player and consolidating the market. Well, certainly if the Dawn.com article is to be believed. This contends that "before the merger talks with the Telenor group... China Mobile had offered to buy the management shares of Warid Telecom Pakistan" but could not settle on an acceptable price.

The article also claims that Pakistan's five leading mobile operators - Mobilink, Telenor Pakistan, Ufone, Warid Telecom and China Mobile's Zong - have reportedly all told the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) that there is room for only four players. The further claim is made that a PTA official has said that by 2010 the country may indeed have just four mobile operators.

I have no idea of the source of this assertion, but it does now seem clear that Telenor Pakistan, at least, feels that the market is currently split too many ways. According to Mehtab Haider of the Pakistani newspaper the News, writing today, the cellco's CEO Jon Eddy Abdullah predicts market consolidation. In an interview with the News, Abdullah said Pakistan had the lowest call rates in the world and a continuous reduction in charges, as seen in the past, to attract customers was no longer viable. "This means that in the long term, having five operators in a market with intense competition and low prices may not remain feasible anymore," said Abdullah. "This can result in anything from mergers and acquisitions to [players] dropping out of the market," he added.

Abdullah mentioned two other significant challenges faced by operators in Pakistan - double-digit inflation affecting consumers' ability to afford services and the "overall law and order situation" limiting network expansion, restricting maintenance activity, increasing security-related expenses and dampening investor confidence.

The security situation in the country certainly does seem to present challenges for cellcos. Orascom Telecom-owned Mobilink, for example, has suffered damage to its network due the military opetation in Swat and Buner, where the army has been fighting with militant insurgents.

The Telenor Pakistan CEO was a little more upbeat about recent tax measures made by the country's Government - lower General Sales Tax; SIM activation tax slashed by 50%; the elimination of regulatory duty on handsets; lower customs duty on imported handsets.

"Although we consider these tax measures positive," said Abdullah, "we feel that there is more to be done. We are all aware of the impact of high tax rates on the industry, which depress growth in subscriber numbers, divert investments and ultimately discourage mobile usage."

"We also understand that when this industry flourishes," he continued, "it helps the economy by attracting foreign direct investment, contributing heavily to the national exchequer, generating employment and increasing productivity of almost every sector. Therefore, it is imperative that the taxation structure for the mobile industry is rationalised further."

Another telecoms industry leader seeminly keen to see cellular sector consolidation is Walid Irshaid, President and CEO of PTCL, Pakistan's incumbent wireline operator, in which the UAE's Etisalat owns a minority stake (but with management control), and of which MNO Ufone is a wholly owned subsidiary.

Farhan Sharif of Bloomberg, writing late last month, states that PTCL is in talks with several domestic companies to make acquisitions this year. "We’re already in discussions with various carriers and operators," Walid Irshaid said in an interview with Bloomberg News on June 16th during the CommunicAsia 2009 conference in Singapore. "The market must surely consolidate", continued Irsaid because he feels that Pakistan doesn’t need more than three GSM operators. He declined to name the companies with which he is in talks.

Between the Zong-Telenor takeover rumour and the comments of the CEOs quoted here, there does seem to be a body of evidence to suggest Pakistan's mobile market is set for consolidation.

So, how many cellcos would that leave? Thus far, this article has mentioned five currently in operation. There is, however, at least one more doing business in the country (which is why this article has a title that looks like a confusing equation).

One of these is rather unusual - the Special Communication Organisation (SCO), set up by the Government of Pakistan to provide services in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and Northern Areas. According to one article I found, Pakistani army officers, both serving and retired, hold critical positions in the SCO.

One other cellco confuses me. Instaphone, a US TDMA network operator, was once part-owned by Millicom International Cellular (as was Paktel - sold to China Mobile and rebranded Zong). A slew of articles going back at least as far as January 2008 suggest the MNO had its licence terminated some time ago by the PTA for failing to make outstanding payments. However, the operator's website remains live and it still seemed to be fighting the PTA as recently as April this year. According to WCIS, the US TDMA operator currently has around 50,000 subs on its network - a market share of just 0.05%.
Share/Save/Bookmark