More musings on a latin t(r)ip

The most recent article here was both a round up of some recent news from Paraguay and a trip down memory lane. I reminisced fondly about an interesting tour of four South American countries which I enjoyed last year. In doing so, I mentioned in passing the two telecoms cooperatives I was able to visit in Bolivia.

COMTECO HQ, Cochabama Bolivia

As the Bolivia market report from telecoms industry watchers Buddecomm notes, the Andean country is one of South America's poorest and least developed. According to Buddecomm's figures, Bolivia has the continent's lowest mobile penetration and second lowest fixed line teledensity. With regard to the former measure, data from the the World Cellular Information Service supports this claim. WCIS indicates that the country's mobile penetration stood at just 60.08% as of the end of September this year. Most other countries in South America's less affluent northern region show much higher numbers, for example:

• Venezuela - 105.98%
• Ecuador - 91.35%
  
• Colombia - 83.75%

In the more prosperous Conosur region, the numbers tend to be higher still, for example:

• Uruguay - 117.10%
  
• Argentina - 115.97%
• Chile - 98.33%
  

Certainly, Bolivia seemed to be a visibly less affluent country than others I have been able to visit in the region. Although I did spend one night in the capital, La Paz, in order to make an early flight on to Caracas (via Lima), my meetings were elsewhere. The cities I visited were Santa Cruz and Cochabamba. The former city is Bolivia's most populous and is at the heart of the country's economic activity. The latter city is Bolivia's third largest settlement, set in an Andean valley, with a magnificent backdrop of mountain peaks.

As described in the most recent post here, the purpose of my tour around South America was to drum up support for the Americas Com conference and exhibition, the success of which it was one of my tasks to contribute towards until last year. In the other countries I visited, it was sufficient to spend time just in their capital cities, travelling between meetings by taxi. This would not have worked in Bolivia, where in the wireline space, at least, the telecommunications market is highly fragmented.

In Bolivia, a national incumbent fixed line operator - Entel - does exist. This was renationalised by the left wing administration of President Evo Morales just weeks after we visited the company's Santa Cruz office. My understanding, however, is that the majority of the country's PSTN subscriptions are with the numerous cooperatives. We felt it could be useful to visit some of these. In Santa Cruz, we were received at the offices of COTAS (Cooperativa de Telecomunicaciones Santa Cruz). In Cochabamba, we visited the headquarters of COMTECO (Cooperativa de Telecomunicaciones Cochabamba).

Entel offices, Santa Cruz, Bolivia

As with the visit to Paraguay's COPACO described in the most recent previous article here, conversations with the representatives of these cooperatives (about how they might contribute to our conference) were strikingly unlike those we had at the offices of private sector telcos elsewhere in South America. Again, the themes to which our contacts warmed most readily were around bridging the digital divide and extending the availability of affordable basic services to poorer and more remotely located users.

While none of these cooperatives have constructed mobile networks, COTAS is able to compete in the cellular space. Bolivia is a rare case of a South American country in which even one MVNOs is in existence - and that MVNO is the mobile offering of COTAS, hosted by Nuevatel (which operates under the Viva brand), an MNO once owned by John Stanton's Western Wireless.

Nuevatel HQ, Santa Cruz, Bolivia

That COTAS is able to operate as an MVNO is not due to any particular encouragement on the part of the Bolivian telecoms regulator. A 2006 report from Diamond Consultants asked whether conditions, at that time, were right for the emergence of MVNOs in India. I'll admit that I haven't yet read this report very carefully, but perhaps it's safe to guess the answer might have been 'no'. After all, as recently as March this year, DevelopingTelecomsWatch was reporting on continued regulatory wrangles which looked set to delay the market entry of MVNOs in India. As part of its discussion, the Diamond Consultants report makes remarks about the state of play for MVNOs in some other markets around the world. Bolivia is observed to be a market in which the regulator has discouraged MVNOs, with policies "primarily driven by the low penetration of mobile services and the low geographic reach of the network." It is further argued that "low ARPUs meant that the discount MVNO model was not viable" The regulator's stance is described as seeing "brand and data service-oriented MVNOs... encroaching on the already limited capacity" Rather than encourage MVNOs to emerge, the report observes, the Bolivian regulator "stepped in and provided incentives to mobile network operators to improve capacity and coverage". Despite this, COTAS Movil was launched in mid-2002 to complement the cooperative's existing portfolio of fixed voice, ADSL and cable TV services.

The report puts Argentina in the same category as Bolivia - markets in which the entry of MVNOs is discouraged by regulatory agencies. Despite this, MVNO services have been launched there. As with Bolivia, this has been done by telecoms cooperatives.

Now, according to TeleGeography, a federation of telecoms coops, Fecosur, is planning to expand the reach of these mobile services, expecting to extend coverage to around 150 cities and municipalities across the country within four or five months. According to the federation’s president, Antonio Roncoroni, the service is already provided in 14 cities throughout the country under the 'Nuestro' banner. Fecosur and another body, Fecotel, jointly represent around 300 telecoms cooperatives across the country.

Having mused here more than once in the past about Latin America's cooperatives and about telcos renationalised by left-of-centre governments - and about how these organisations appear to operate a little differently from those for whom shareholder value is a key consideration - it will be interesting to observe whether this new mobile offering will have any very significant impact on the Argentinean market.

Others who finds the telecoms coops of Latin America at all interesting might like to look over a scholarly paper (dated 2005) from the The Journal of Community Informatics which I found recently and which rounds up the history of the Argentinean cooperatives quite nicely.

As the English winter draws in, thoughts of sunny days touring Latin America's telcos in the balmy days of April 2008 are quite attractive. Hence these musings today.

More musings on a latin t(r)ip

Lucky Seven? Can the Tanzanian market offer solid returns for its (growing) plethora of mobile players?

Via TelecomPaper on Tuesday, I learned that one East African country will soon home to its seventh mobile operator, which will offer services over a CDMA network. With a population of around 40 million, Tanzania is not an insignificant country, but one must wonder if there is room for all players to run profitable operations in a market split so many ways.

How many other markets of about this size support such a large number of MNOs? The answer seems to be... none. Here is a fairly comprehensive sample of nations with populations of roughly the same size:

• Spain - 45m - 4 operators
• Colombia - 44m - 3 operators
• Sudan - 42m - 5 operators
  
• Argentina - 40m - 4 operators
• Kenya - 39 m - 4 operators
  
• Poland - 38m - 4 operators

Even highly penetrated, mature European markets of roughly the same population size, then, are home to fewer MNOs - cause enough, perhaps, to be cautious about the prospects for a brand new entrant in Tanzania. Further, it is already the case that two existing CDMA operators in the country have failed to establish large customer bases. One of these, Benson Informatics, is an ISP and telecoms service provider founded in 2000, which added mobile services to its product portfolio in 2007. To date, according to WCIS, the company has built a market share of just 0.2% - barely 3000 subscribers.

A bit more significant is the mobile network of Tanzania Telecommunications Company (TTCL), with a reported 110,000 subscriptions, down from a high of around 160,000 subs in September 2007. Prior to 2007, TTCL offered a fixed-wireless CDMA WLL service. The decision was then made to offer mobile services. In the two years that have followed, the impact on the market has clearly been very limited.

Once wholly state-owned, TTCL is the oldest and largest wireline telco in the country and operates the PSTN network of mainland Tanzania. The country's name is portmanteau of Tanganyika (the mainland of the present day country) and the Zanzibar achipelago of islands a few miles offshore. In the latter, the fixed-line market is split between TTCL and Zantel, the second basic telephony services provider there.

Given that CDMA mobile operators across Africa are typically pretty minor players in terms of market share, it is perhaps not surprising that TTCL's mobility proposition has not really grabbed the attention of Tanzanian consumers. Further, the company itself is perhaps not ideally geared to compete with the three GSM operators that have collectively established almost a 90% share of the mobile market. While these three are outposts of significant multi-country mobile groups (Zain, Vodacom and Millicom International Cellular), TTCL has, since the early part of this decade been in a number of joint management arrangements necessitated by its financial instability.

The company's rival in the Zanzibar fixed-line space, Zantel, has fared rather better in the mobile space, with a 9.19% market share (about 1.1 million subs on its GSM network).

Overall, the mobile penetration rate of Tanzania has not yet passed the 30% mark, lagging well behind the overall rate for the African continent as a whole (39.19% as of March 2009). Does that mean there is sufficient room for growth for this veritable plethora of mobile players? Perhaps not. In terms of GDP per capita at Purchasing Power Parity, Tanzania appears to rank as low as 50th out of 53 countries in Africa. Further growth of the overall market, therefore, will doubtless by constrained by consumers' ability to afford even very low-cost services.

A discussion of this type is not new territory for Developing Telecoms Watch. In March, I considered the case of Gabon, asking whether a fourth entrant mobile operator could expect to be profitable. Around the same time, I was thinking a bit about how tough the Burundi market appears to be.

Blog posts of this kind are just very quick thumbnail sketches of these markets - a quick look at mobile market metrics (penetration, market share etc.) cross-referenced with some very basic information about the countries themselves. You might be able to guess that for the latter, I am rarely looking further than Wikipedia. So when I raise questions such as whether these markets are attractive to new entrants or likely to see market consolidation, you are seeing nothing more than a bit of pure conjecture. Readers who really understand the markets concerned are warmly invited to correct any glaring errors in my rough analyses or to add some local colour and detail to the stories. Please use the comment function to do so, if you feel so inclined.

I note, for example, that this blog does get visits from Tanzania. Perhaps someone there will be able to offer a view on the prospects of success for the country's latest mobile market entrant which, according to the Citizen newspaper, will trade under the name Sasatel. The company apparently has a licence for voice and data services, Internet service provision and international gateway services and will have a fixed-wireless (CDMA WLL) offering as well as full mobility via a CDMA network.

I would be interested to know the level of this operator's ambitions and to what degree it expects to compete more effectively than Benson Informatics, whose offerings appear to be somewhat similar.

Lucky Seven? Can the Tanzanian market offer solid returns for its (growing) plethora of mobile players?